From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-98504-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3996158020
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 22:30:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA2C2E0942;
	Mon, 14 Nov 2022 22:30:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from foo.stuge.se (foo.stuge.se [212.116.89.98])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7389CE093D
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 22:30:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 15963 invoked by uid 1000); 14 Nov 2022 22:30:15 -0000
Message-ID: <20221114223015.15962.qmail@stuge.se>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 22:30:15 +0000
From: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-mail/vchkuser
References: <291178b1-075f-6d89-8ff3-2a464ea9556f@gentoo.org>
 <20221114164352.11396.qmail@stuge.se>
 <Y3Jw9dBthwkZ2IwD@gentoo.org>
 <20221114215343.15328.qmail@stuge.se>
 <Y3K5+PUbA2/y5hNh@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y3K5+PUbA2/y5hNh@gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 5569372f-5846-43b1-8ac5-b3ead5b399de
X-Archives-Hash: 53c984fb3718c989a9610563082ec518

John Helmert III wrote:
> > Searching for the repo name on GitHub finds this however:
> > 
> > https://github.com/bdrewery/vchkuser
> > 
> > ..which seems to be a 2010 version of the code. I did a test, it works
> > fine. Maybe just change the SRC_URI.
> 
> Can you produce a guarantee that the code there is equal to the code
> which the ebuild currently refers to? Or maybe that it's equivalent to
> the now-removed repository?

Git thinks so.

I unpacked vchkuser-0.4.tar.gz from a Gentoo mirror on top of a
bdrewery/vchkuser checkout and:

$ git status
# On branch master
nothing to commit, working directory clean
$ 

The v0.4 tag in bdrewery/vchkuser also equals the commit hash in the
directory name of the .tar.gz. (This is of course weak.)


//Peter