From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-94271-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BE621382C5
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:45:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED25EE089C;
	Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:45:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mout01.posteo.de (mout01.posteo.de [185.67.36.65])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A54B0E0895
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:45:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) 
	by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87791240027
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:45:20 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017;
	t=1619099120; bh=GPGCUB4o7LdGszOSU0QbZ185/1DnWmPu9eNQi1cH6cE=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:From;
	b=Qy7e4lVoWCUW8tpo1in0H11aU3qVyrCa67kDXMvZoFAAyLZt4U4jB/menEsHSjAox
	 IbMBAYYm85N2z9QEPSvi5zYtnBZGhm7uFHc9U+O/sOwJhmjFKoqJC/dvRRHE+rDjbD
	 9jYgTJP9u1EfvLRpj3VexqVnWd9fTgg8UdvEkxsmM7pl5BqhtAI9NnImtXPCKfnMV1
	 PeV2vtDo3tjAQHyFa5BjO2lO+rwXQfGxBARFkJw5m03JhsHpN7dHGNh+VOaPE5i4WT
	 lSFsJsjRzs9b8IWFy/CI7FVjbBUGk9149+oroFvjrIeJx3BECF/INTKZHupo3Kb6lo
	 KU1AG4BRnikDw==
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4FQzFT4gsNz9rxD
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:45:17 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:45:11 +0000
From: Theo Anderson <telans@posteo.de>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Continuous integration on GURU
Message-ID: <20210423014511.7d3feae3@genbox>
In-Reply-To: <4291440.8F6SAcFxjW@spectre>
References: <13171428.RDIVbhacDa@spectre>
	<20210422222200.43738c4c@genbox>
	<4291440.8F6SAcFxjW@spectre>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 2ee5eb04-1434-40a5-9586-a0ac5c369814
X-Archives-Hash: 74ee632e9fe2f4c12890524fec132205

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:30:10 +0200
Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On gioved=EC 22 aprile 2021 12:22:00 CEST Theo Anderson wrote:
> > On the subject of many bugs, there are now almost 150 open bugs
> > assigned to guru@gentoo.org. With this has come quite an email
> > avalanche for which I think people must have set up mail filters by
> > now. I imagine this means that bugs will no longer get the same
> > amount of attention as they used to. To increase the visibility do
> > you think it would be a good idea to CC or assign the bugs to the
> > specific package maintainers rather than guru@gentoo.org? =20
>=20
> Hello Theo,
>=20
> I'm fine to assign directly and/or cc'ing guru@. For now I'm
> following the guidelines but it takes one second to change it.
> Please discuss this internally and let me know if I have to change
> the assignee.
>=20
> Agostino
>=20

Hi Agostino,

After some discussion in IRC we've agreed to have the maintainer of
the respective packages be assigned to the bug with guru@g.o be CC'd.
Where no maintainer exists for a package guru@g.o remains as the
assignee. If you could make those changes that would be great (I
suppose doing it retroactively would be a bit of a mission and is out
of the question).

Thanks