From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3B441382C5 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 10:22:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 61417E085B; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 10:22:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout02.posteo.de (mout02.posteo.de [185.67.36.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BB96E0844 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 10:22:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAA6F240100 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 12:22:12 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1619086932; bh=Zk3lapoJ+qHhSQUxBKUlMyV0gX99PlXSXmxZFN0fls8=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=eseOsH85vylR4GFyOnD5L4jkzzm8fBGxqAOXUvOejFuVhBSWXQXQAQ04V87CyVgEk 5jrTCpWCpGJJaX0445so1sXJ3AxMNx4iTCTAEISXJ/M2CnVMXhCAKlvipH74mjr+wc eKhD8AJaUB/EjlLdsEv76ByEZ/9Aehdwdt/Et2lFAMisU4QF78U09cuaV9W/mMMABx YC9suyqIaK2gS/T7bOHUS9eICjeYV0Zf0My/C6Jp7+BgDqzrdre64S6XqGImBm4DRf RuJxttC0vJv7hktrgnk4rHiGw1AkmPb2KM5KJcYTnOiqDx3nJZeOCXHo1k5BJWikRe YF5/i2Z6YFpbw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4FQtl66r6Mz9rxP for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 12:22:10 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 10:22:00 +0000 From: Theo Anderson To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Continuous integration on GURU Message-ID: <20210422222200.43738c4c@genbox> In-Reply-To: <13171428.RDIVbhacDa@spectre> References: <13171428.RDIVbhacDa@spectre> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 0c87611a-2052-4e88-a879-e21b6601b257 X-Archives-Hash: beb334c1fc6d04f8ff23dab529cf93be On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 11:59:21 +0200 Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to let you know that the CI is now able to work with > overlays. > > Since Guru is pretty active I took advantage of this situation to > implement and test the CI Thank you for implementing this, it certainly helps raise the standard of guru packages. > > Atm it has been configured to work with master branch. > I don't know how much is useful scan the dev branch since a first > revision has not yet been done. If you have opinions about, please > let me know. I'm not sure this would be very beneficial. It's often that feedback is left on packages in dev to get them in a presentable or issue free state before being pushed to master. Running the tinderbox against dev might just make a few too many bugs, perhaps picking up some which are already in the process of being fixed. The dev branch doesn't lag too far behind master these days anyhow. > > More info at: > https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2020/07/04/gentoo-tinderbox/ > > The bugs will have an internal_ref as guru_ci. > > Agostino > On the subject of many bugs, there are now almost 150 open bugs assigned to guru@gentoo.org. With this has come quite an email avalanche for which I think people must have set up mail filters by now. I imagine this means that bugs will no longer get the same amount of attention as they used to. To increase the visibility do you think it would be a good idea to CC or assign the bugs to the specific package maintainers rather than guru@gentoo.org? Cheers Theo