From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F07671381F3 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 15:59:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2541CE081A; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 15:59:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15D77E07FE for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 15:59:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 04:59:40 +1300 From: Kent Fredric To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages & projects up for grabs due to jer's retirement Message-ID: <20201110045940.5976a514@katipo2.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <212212062c681be0fd04b2146a6926e71160899d.camel@gentoo.org> <493662a6-6702-7ace-25af-c32849ccac12@gentoo.org> <20201109111759.049e8b3b@katipo2.lan> <6490410e-f700-2f15-ae1f-9134bb54de9f@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.7 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/jSPHjr.LaQipLJupucpNITv"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 X-Archives-Salt: 8614ba1f-98c2-4359-9760-c2b999e5b499 X-Archives-Hash: 7f8ed95e7766a5716e1232188b092f80 --Sig_/jSPHjr.LaQipLJupucpNITv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 12:15:07 +0200 Jaco Kroon wrote: > You mentioned working raport with upstream?=C2=A0 Can we rely on that to = at > the very least get them to update that to "due to the way Gentoo > functions we request that you first file issues with the Gentoo > repository rather than directly with rxvt-unicode?=C2=A0 That is pure and > outright slander, and whilst I "get" (to an extent) and GNU/Linux > statement - he should then have the same issue with RedHat Enterprise > GNU/Linux.=C2=A0 Or with "Debian" and "CentOS" for that matter which does= not > contain "GNU/Linux" in the name.=C2=A0 Alternatively if there is no issue > with that then perhaps we should consider just being "Gentoo" ... Historical context probably matters here. That's a very old statement. Partly from the era when Gentoo was "cool" and when "ricing" was a thing. At the time, upstream was inundated with absurd requests like "oh noes, I disabled CXX Exceptions, and the code broke, upstream is wrong!". Whatever we did, or upstream did, the absurd complaints have gone away. But I'll see what I can wrangle :) --Sig_/jSPHjr.LaQipLJupucpNITv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEgdrME8Lrmai3DXYJda6SGagVg7UFAl+pZ2wACgkQda6SGagV g7VLEA//aCT2OnvyORmfpMsAoaqDDPRAE7ln7Vzbe/KXycFhLT+0rBHDdZY2gLSq Tjh1wScA4Q3a4IY1jWN+fzeXFrPuIf2i3uysf2Z3CwizX0+TiGzVCiBplADqtII0 aref6mA7RYh+Go+MOzDs2Jma5gBoT7pl7SvG9xDqIvztF9xwh5ehcFko/a5J6/r8 TKg49Hrtzi8f2ruUSSMbp8laSpxGcxy4pVmUcCyeZOA7k3koGLWZCdK4m3/iXICs SYNFEbOy44sWkj/zWArAeSgkYkbbE8eMvR9MbgSDpJEiQTZbs9ZH3zkdAx36trNX MXGgP3EMDBepI6FsBSoEilGeWgCQrTalw5r8FoL8kqZgW3lQ9ykVTeUTdRdlF601 s/yv7ZSJNzIB9nljWaIvJ5gk9XiWJZLY6sOFo4d+n9WRnfOpg0lHW0SWs0guYxeP S8RFlqJT8nIdMFQYzKPhY/QR5L+gu5ObeBtVYMU4HM+6ZGbyKcUnDq2jHkFNOAoV fE/0oD/CTq1HMe+F/Vh181SA3kHWqL4mhvIFVWSHjgA3vNr1V1PJQjOXE2aEu3Y6 gi1cFUfF8m3yN4tdSS1E5944maFePiGEGJUiWhmy54dxS4Oluu/QL0y0yamZCxXp 5Tj+0FPta55W1zMeljXWgk2KJCTQ9lJE61QIEV0yYlzamqGasjw= =ua5r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/jSPHjr.LaQipLJupucpNITv--