From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F3A2138334 for ; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 09:35:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E2E89E0C02; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 09:35:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C1A5E0BEB for ; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 09:35:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:980:3ff0:64:8069:ad90:756f:d446]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: grobian) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52FE234DC31 for ; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 09:35:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2019 10:35:09 +0100 From: Fabian Groffen To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Keywordreqs and slacking arch teams Message-ID: <20191228093509.GB2033@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20191228222702.017cbbaa@katipo2.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IrhDeMKUP4DT/M7F" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191228222702.017cbbaa@katipo2.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.13.1 (Darwin 19.2.0, VIM - Vi IMproved 8.1) Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc. X-Archives-Salt: fd1be1c9-9d18-45af-be67-674771310295 X-Archives-Hash: 350e734d1744a9a7cc76f00374ad0830 --IrhDeMKUP4DT/M7F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 28-12-2019 22:27:02 +1300, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 08:09:33 +0100 > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: >=20 > > How can we improve this? >=20 > Every time this kind of issue comes up, I can't help feeling we need > some sort of tool more advanced than what we currently have. >=20 > Something that maintains persistence of keyword demands similar to how > the current bot does, but more ...=20 >=20 > Its the sort of thing I get tempted to implement myself, but get too > horrified about the prospect of working with portage internals to do it. Hmmm, interested to hear what kind of things you're thinking about here. I feel it would help if we would have the ability to at least compile/test ebuilds automatically. Not sure how helpful qemu could be there, but I know things like compiling for things like arm (RPi) works reasonably well. Thanks, Fabian --=20 Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level --IrhDeMKUP4DT/M7F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEELUvHd/Gtp7LaU1vuzpXahU5EQpMFAl4HIc0ACgkQzpXahU5E QpOWawf/Z45hxYfja1ylzsXhEjV5viGLpXhVNG3rJzWCJfARr0RzD4BjlXjiyX2w tHlj6U62Gp/2enoE4uHyWAaXyhUyHLnEke0Q5p1Wj93XcOvMtstDl3ZHSbWmD7mV gEOcnbUwrVb4RjWAOjkTt8AeIgfEwWslXNO3uAitcTxq9hYqULxWCSnej5rk8iT+ gFLncCggZsbjg06RPhsqrQZCtWZI0wQiQMwxcUJNlLsvVTkJa4kW2tcww0vApfEc 17qATzTQninxmWImPHqYIdkhdTOT3o+lrpq13SZPOYtaQY0hee4Ki9mKoCjN4q+8 qd2YlklIMDiVTvcw+Rm4YX7c6jFb+Q== =wujS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IrhDeMKUP4DT/M7F--