From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A3BC138334 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 01:54:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4754DE0980; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 01:54:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F19A3E0969 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 01:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from katipo2.lan (unknown [203.86.205.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kentnl) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2CBC134D54E for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 01:54:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 14:54:20 +1300 From: Kent Fredric To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to slis' retirement Message-ID: <20191219145420.25de4adb@katipo2.lan> In-Reply-To: <23766922-df85-0592-e65d-ac0750edc1c8@veremit.xyz> References: <23766922-df85-0592-e65d-ac0750edc1c8@veremit.xyz> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/bWli2M6kZGYlDLt=n5r7=k="; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 X-Archives-Salt: 419b5030-5f01-4177-8948-a63bcd34c336 X-Archives-Hash: 10573b4a2bb063ef40f4ba35f683079a --Sig_/bWli2M6kZGYlDLt=n5r7=k= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 22:35:40 +0000 Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > There is some very strange wrapping/formatting in this message, was that > intentional? If I had to guess, I'd say the word-wrap length was accidentally set to "8" instead of "80". --Sig_/bWli2M6kZGYlDLt=n5r7=k= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEgdrME8Lrmai3DXYJda6SGagVg7UFAl362EwACgkQda6SGagV g7Wr7BAAr1KD8bCxcx++qxdIeeR7eruqk51n/IjWlPKn45enFkJrSy8D2BKVQfjn wfWhMktylU4GncN87kApL41SjqgHABmkO8f3xqAjJ7hUF2d5VZ9GqmBqVAG7jCkq +GnD+TocAmhozO+TBmIP0JEiY2fl27FrY6z2Hzeux9Mn9OLqpjjbpxt07wYzpkad wV8C8PR7o+962RVXR1+kKljsK9KA7s2wIiQOCwMACDqKgIn/71fShrl5E8OkIpUZ gPGQ41cH8h+QX0ysNjuVIaykcclLC2i3CYskyDHmQJQyelLPt5P8o5lz+g1L4HBj URXlTaoJAzfk+u2WzFUYV/zSd4QCd/hz7zNBP+9qd+OwYUyrFLTdAqO8I7bkU1GI GlSZEaOA/GzWj+ivCUGMsoSHcqiYlobJ/pkOzs6lN39w6DhBZbXcYw24KEvy/CJ5 4ylsXbpFiDXAkMe1JV36CF0w2qYoMXUUtaNqC2AuNqmdvTYuHWYEImDSP0V8tm+w 89n7LeDxHF2NPs+2nJBIKTfrZd8ZlWj1Kvk154tYDEcmS9t7Ngh1aK1a1goT1DjC bsrdSSSRSNAaoNr3qKy6Dm0M+WWvN+Qk0l3sT6m7dOiq2edIh6hSKhiuWd1lQ2v+ 6NunaYolxUmmC+u97a2Fgv+x6y8mYF0hhY1UszrirXlswxSD+ss= =eLbW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/bWli2M6kZGYlDLt=n5r7=k=--