From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0564B138334 for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 23:46:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B6EA8E086A; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 23:46:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA25AE0856 for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 23:46:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from whubbs1.gaikai.biz (unknown [69.36.134.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: williamh) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EDF5834D786; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 23:46:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (nullmailer pid 25556 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 03 Dec 2019 23:46:08 -0000 Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 17:46:08 -0600 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: floppym@gentoo.org, mgorny@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: unmaintained Go packages with license issues Message-ID: <20191203234608.GA25406@whubbs1.dev.av1.gaikai.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, floppym@gentoo.org, mgorny@gentoo.org References: <67b4effecf1c4343614b4e528e5373b5feb5bc0c.camel@gentoo.org> <20191203163817.GA14214@whubbs1.dev.av1.gaikai.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5vNYLRcllDrimb99" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Archives-Salt: 6b0f7e2e-e5be-4692-8bf5-45304fe6a02b X-Archives-Hash: 960687fc6eb7d27f106568554fd2ec1b --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 04:48:56PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: > I think it would be more appropriate for you to update/unmask them > yourself as you correct the license information. If there are no objections, I'd rather unmask them all immediately then fix the license info.=20 Normally I wouldn't ask for this, but there is an immediate need for them that I'm aware of. If there is an objection that's fine I'm just putting this out there. Thanks, William --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQTVeuxEZo4uUHOkQAluVBb0MMRlOAUCXebztwAKCRBuVBb0MMRl OCEzAKCwHowPQu2aHWgTux2fCXupD97HMQCfUHNmrM6cwPo1k+JQWL8ENAuymCk= =A5pR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5vNYLRcllDrimb99--