From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0B35138334 for ; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 07:18:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CBA8EE0871; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 07:18:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45DC7E0845 for ; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 07:18:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from katipo2.lan (unknown [203.86.205.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kentnl) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1DB8534C3F7 for ; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 07:18:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2019 20:17:49 +1300 From: Kent Fredric To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/3] virtual/cargo: drop virtual Message-ID: <20191026201749.68890078@katipo2.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <20191025220340.2715-1-gyakovlev@gentoo.org> <20191025220340.2715-3-gyakovlev@gentoo.org> <20191026165918.104a631e@katipo2.lan> <7bf8deff-49e9-c333-d4a5-2c19364e1841@veremit.xyz> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/1k4uoinXhuM1cwXQmMvmFy1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 X-Archives-Salt: 224e8007-b201-4bfe-802b-67fa4115555f X-Archives-Hash: d99525bffd646e977aa7f1552955bafa --Sig_/1k4uoinXhuM1cwXQmMvmFy1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 08:34:50 +0200 Francesco Riosa wrote: > So basically the eclass should be bumped, with the old one deprecated? =20 I don't think rev-bumping the eclass is a useful way to fix this either. It could work, but I suspect it just expands the problem slightly. --Sig_/1k4uoinXhuM1cwXQmMvmFy1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEgdrME8Lrmai3DXYJda6SGagVg7UFAl2z8x4ACgkQda6SGagV g7VbGg//UBEz02WRNkY9MjcJjiW24T2Xq5rmRCR1vQCMyj6H+jBoQ4VxgUkqwg+B 7u4WCn/tYkZQpYEpLscUum8GaYxqFarNhIfE9BBz6U2658OcFrC45+Rb/455WWhA FcUoiV1LeEjNJmBCT1zLnKJzs0fNbUa3b/hL82yfFfBEyx4b/wd5QipGTaxqlwJA rbh2saejRxSNHRUDsCrsHWvrXXYoHncPPmBdHo33E5bXZmwYuJXhy97O567tREoo /VJwv4ZENhORaOf2cxVKM9Brxp3wc+DB1DSdicJxAq8YHFuGzW2t8Ta/sPdAuSx/ +QJ66Gu0jzbiLZQssO6dlUje44Mh+5zEng7KcqJ0ibDT73+BiEwgJi5M/93vAJxZ UgtE7rleP3C+wWwzh8MhON1ydObToDuKag1xD6sQjXueM4a2f+WXuThWq6T7ABbi vGrk5xpU92EgnVyCYKiy1G5IRj47A90/YRMaJYrUkt3Nr2kJD235jttGhIdRMcwT Xg7SGWDUnL7PNlt1fu1B8MuIr0KJsDfGKOXXgEfEUusLEKFsRUmTqWSbNLFlvCUX qj7BvbIKMpPitK6WQrAqEgDHW6Y8Xw2/Cs7JQlC44ib6yUVPNSvNk+S+0SbYR0Cm ZKTwbEf27tG6qnAA5if91R5medeNPIKhYNEcQ8x6h1bWK9pmzmE= =bl9+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/1k4uoinXhuM1cwXQmMvmFy1--