From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18A14138334 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 18:39:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 45356E0869; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 18:39:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 578D4E05C1 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 18:39:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from whubbs1.gaikai.biz (unknown [100.42.103.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: williamh) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C77F434C23E for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 18:39:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (nullmailer pid 28355 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 23 Oct 2019 18:38:56 -0000 Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 13:38:56 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New distfile mirror layout Message-ID: <20191023183856.GA28326@whubbs1.dev.av1.gaikai.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <752be6c75f337df8ee8124a804247d2fb27e73b4.camel@gentoo.org> <12e05dbf-9b62-0167-85c1-6f671e156a54@gentoo.org> <20191023170624.GA25673@whubbs1.dev.av1.gaikai.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191023170624.GA25673@whubbs1.dev.av1.gaikai.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Archives-Salt: 20138c51-1506-401a-8587-6bfe5b5b5edd X-Archives-Hash: 543a4a045d123134a7926b20ccec567a --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 12:06:24PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 01:18:02AM -0400, Joshua Kinard wrote: > > On 10/21/2019 19:36, Matt Turner wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 9:42 AM Richard Yao wrote: > > >> Also, another idea is to use a cheap hash function (e.g. fletcher) a= nd just have the mirrors do the hashing behind the scenes. Then we would ha= ve the best of both worlds. > > >=20 > > > It probably would have been better to make these suggestions when the > > > GLEP was discussed close to two years ago. > > >=20 > > > I'm glad that we have ideas for improvements but I worry that we're > > > just backseat driving at this point given that the GLEP's now > > > implemented. > =20 > Nothing is really etched in stone, so we could change it again if we > see fit. =20 Actually, which glep are we talking about? If we are talking about glep 75, I don't see where the council approved it [1], so it definitely should be discussed/approved before any implementation changes are made, or we should see where it was approved. William [1] https://www.gentoo.org/glep/glep-0075.html --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQTVeuxEZo4uUHOkQAluVBb0MMRlOAUCXbCeOwAKCRBuVBb0MMRl OEdWAKCcp/ioHB8eM5TrWFrl0Q9RtksthgCfUUQyUDlYN9YgJoekcd/7Tt75qx4= =FYek -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF--