From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D694138334 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:06:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F0F62E08C0; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:06:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF91FE0880 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:06:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from whubbs1.gaikai.biz (unknown [100.42.103.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: williamh) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C67AE34C273 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:06:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (nullmailer pid 25703 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:06:24 -0000 Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 12:06:24 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New distfile mirror layout Message-ID: <20191023170624.GA25673@whubbs1.dev.av1.gaikai.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <752be6c75f337df8ee8124a804247d2fb27e73b4.camel@gentoo.org> <12e05dbf-9b62-0167-85c1-6f671e156a54@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <12e05dbf-9b62-0167-85c1-6f671e156a54@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Archives-Salt: fa270242-7d15-483f-856e-4ed42163ad42 X-Archives-Hash: 8fbb6ea11208cb6eb625cb2965ba99d0 --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 01:18:02AM -0400, Joshua Kinard wrote: > On 10/21/2019 19:36, Matt Turner wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 9:42 AM Richard Yao wrote: > >> Also, another idea is to use a cheap hash function (e.g. fletcher) and= just have the mirrors do the hashing behind the scenes. Then we would have= the best of both worlds. > >=20 > > It probably would have been better to make these suggestions when the > > GLEP was discussed close to two years ago. > >=20 > > I'm glad that we have ideas for improvements but I worry that we're > > just backseat driving at this point given that the GLEP's now > > implemented. =20 Nothing is really etched in stone, so we could change it again if we see fit. *snip* > IMHO, perhaps future GLEPs should have a defined window to implement them > following discussion. Having the discussion, then waiting a few years > before implementing them leads to discussions like this where we're argui= ng > about the color of the boat after the boat has sailed off into the distan= ce. Agreed. I will work on a proposal for the next council meeting. Thanks, William --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQTVeuxEZo4uUHOkQAluVBb0MMRlOAUCXbCIigAKCRBuVBb0MMRl OHVYAJkB7Gb+qci/CVcGdpB34LBsJLm/HQCfTSbaJjRrhkOLdpIzqm0KlVewVnA= =rW9a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY--