From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1006A138334 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 03:39:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D9CAE087D; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 03:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24366E086E for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 03:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from katipo2.lan (unknown [203.86.205.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kentnl) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB14734BADA for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 03:39:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 16:39:36 +1300 From: Kent Fredric To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Disable --autounmask auto-unmasking keywords / masks by default Message-ID: <20191010163936.2f0f8363@katipo2.lan> In-Reply-To: <4c66c937-072d-03b3-49be-81e598198ae7@veremit.xyz> References: <20191010125323.6acc64f5@katipo2.lan> <20191010155705.2bf1479b@katipo2.lan> <4c66c937-072d-03b3-49be-81e598198ae7@veremit.xyz> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/gh3iJ7BHgTvqKkcXLqjI+tY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 X-Archives-Salt: 5c070ff3-2306-4138-ad2d-353a61f6c84c X-Archives-Hash: 86099074c255c3186bdf89a8388fc72b --Sig_/gh3iJ7BHgTvqKkcXLqjI+tY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 04:35:22 +0100 Michael Everitt wrote: > Is there any mileage in something as ridiculous as AUTOUNMASK_EXCLUDES ? Would depend on what that means, where that variable was used, and what it contains.... But the sort of breakage type it can trigger is not limited to any specific package. Pretty much any ** packages are prone to this happening, and that's so unacceptable, that people have suggested/considered removing ** packages just to avoid this issue. And that pretty much makes the defined purpose of those packages useless, and makes that keywording grade useless. --Sig_/gh3iJ7BHgTvqKkcXLqjI+tY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEgdrME8Lrmai3DXYJda6SGagVg7UFAl2ep/gACgkQda6SGagV g7Ut0w/+KNz/zX9MAxCGKzCdgo+UoO7Ege1IyHqskXSxDepPox6F1ykROyR78gh3 FeZ5yJXkRLbRp4gZX5u5lJSluxT+5HRFPi7OIf1b0OGgb0+ucEMVIMt2hDr2L1t9 PtzMRZ2Gg29BZWRB5cih3IBUe0M/JWPvdr/SqwxbDbhCEUkD05AUaCF1mj9Oeh+X a77DqhpZpDNuFsrvV65obiEvpY6yZCDNC1dweTQcSm49q+hV4Cj2wYLZOzrIb5FU DbM96Ad6d8cp8pg/CJiGcZiox/0/SJH/gYi2wz66P6jvVLIum4ZQYOWk7juZgS1K NRrTAGwX8Kf7fSIPZEmfLNuOWXtLkxrzBJV3CGS8b95SuiZ7wLfPJnrFM4x1tz+M 1e4Qad+2XahJLhpIk91kNtELzZps8pjGwH4ynCQ+fwpcuVIci/j/0DbEyXO0oBXw EirGUIvGKGpRQXu3bmugluNmQau1wi1ZYtPU0mk5B/rbf0qvlJydFRtGEimK8/xn 9WZKcI8U01mvGuZbL341G4pFMyoxTdZfwBYEdV+pnZSu5OiQ6qNPMEvdNZFmqvWq I+NUPJHuYa9QZW90yFpV9e54f1ZWJsC6BaTYj85KHF1RR8F2ghSR/GjsvRIV7Vgi 35/G05s5YitRg+n9Sym+IoQRLhZLtYoPanph6lcarNr/OBVuD0U= =2+QG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/gh3iJ7BHgTvqKkcXLqjI+tY--