From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FBCC138334 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 18:47:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F0A9E0A95; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 18:47:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0226BE09EA for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 18:47:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sf (tunnel547699-pt.tunnel.tserv1.lon2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f1c:3e6::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: slyfox) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A146A34B121; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 18:47:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 19:46:58 +0100 From: Sergei Trofimovich To: Ulrich Mueller , Manoj Gupta Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] toolchain-funcs: Add tc-ld-is-lld helper. Message-ID: <20190913194658.17a87ce8@sf> In-Reply-To: References: <20190912113240.226571-1-manojgupta@google.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 59d4cbe7-e078-42e7-9b83-4312b6a3b33f X-Archives-Hash: 330c6838b715158bb954c5df2d512bec On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 16:53:34 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>>>> On Fri, 13 Sep 2019, Manoj Gupta wrote: > > > Thanks for the review. I did it this way to make this an exact copy of > > tc-ld-is-gold function above it except the LLD checks. > > Should I also change the tc-ld-is-gold function? > > Good question. Presumably the eclass maintainers should have the last > word on this. I've pushed the change as-is. You can send follow-up patch. Or I'll get to to it later. -- Sergei