From: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, prefix@gentoo.org,
hardened@gentoo.org, arm@gentoo.org, mips@gentoo.org,
ppc@gentoo.org, ppc64@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecation and removal of 13.0 profiles is imminent
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:52:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190219225210.2f156b08@sf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181216195638.146c625a@sf>
On Sun, 16 Dec 2018 19:56:38 +0000
Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 00:25:04 +0000
> Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> > Tl;DR: 13.0 profiles will be removed some time soon unless there are
> > enough reports broken on 13.0->17.0 switch.
> >
> > 13.0 profiles been a while in Gentoo tree and are already deprecated
> > on some arches but not everywhere.
> >
> > If you have problems using 17.0 profiles as a default please file a bug
> > and pile it against against the tracker bug (fresh one):
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/672960
>
> I filed a bunch of bugs to deprecate existing profile that rely on
> 'releases/13.0' profile snippet.
>
> To deprecate a profile just drop a 'deprecated' file to profile dir
> that targets to target for users to switch to. Example:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/672960#c2
> Note: package.desc still remains
>
> At removal time we will delete both deprecated profiles and package.desc entries.
A few months passed and we almost finished with a long tail.
To-be-deprecated profiles yet are:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/673278
prefix/linux-standalone/ppc64
+prefix@, what is our plan here? Can we drop at least empty
'deprecated' file to notify users?
https://bugs.gentoo.org/673276
hardened/linux/arm/armv6j
hardened/linux/arm/armv7a
hardened/linux/mips/mipsel/multilib/n32
hardened/linux/mips/mipsel/multilib/n64
hardened/linux/mips/mipsel/n32
hardened/linux/mips/mipsel/n64
hardened/linux/mips/multilib/n32
hardened/linux/mips/multilib/n64
hardened/linux/mips/n32
hardened/linux/mips/n64
hardened/linux/powerpc/ppc32
hardened/linux/powerpc/ppc64/32bit-userland
hardened/linux/powerpc/ppc64/64bit-userland
+hardened@ (and +arm@, +mips@, +ppc@, +ppc64) ,
is it fine to redirect these to vanilla 17.0 profiles?
--
Sergei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-19 22:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-12 0:25 [gentoo-dev] Deprecation and removal of 13.0 profiles is imminent Sergei Trofimovich
2018-12-16 19:56 ` Sergei Trofimovich
2019-02-19 22:52 ` Sergei Trofimovich [this message]
2019-02-20 8:07 ` Fabian Groffen
2019-02-21 3:05 ` Joshua Kinard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190219225210.2f156b08@sf \
--to=slyfox@gentoo.org \
--cc=arm@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=hardened@gentoo.org \
--cc=mips@gentoo.org \
--cc=ppc64@gentoo.org \
--cc=ppc@gentoo.org \
--cc=prefix@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox