From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB088158015 for ; Sat, 30 Dec 2023 05:09:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 67D4A2BC051; Sat, 30 Dec 2023 05:09:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC7782BC01C for ; Sat, 30 Dec 2023 05:09:17 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <2018286ec127ba4ec7e27960db67e3b49a3cc620.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] global USE=gpg From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2023 06:09:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-uOh48f8SrrbVWONMY0m1" User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 84ac13ce-a305-4ef7-b858-394c9d412013 X-Archives-Hash: c21bec719e2711a34ee4788dcdc6ca35 --=-uOh48f8SrrbVWONMY0m1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2023-12-30 at 00:41 +0100, Jonas Stein wrote: > Dear all, >=20 > we have many local gpg useflags which basically just enable gpg. > Should we merge these to one global useflag? >=20 > Additionally we have a few gpgme useflags. > See also https://bugs.gentoo.org/679634 >=20 > What are your ideas? >=20 We have also have a bunch of USE=3Dpgp and USE=3Dopenpgp, both of which are more correct than USE=3Dgpg. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-uOh48f8SrrbVWONMY0m1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAABCgAwFiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAmWPpfkSHG1nb3JueUBn ZW50b28ub3JnAAoJEGOa2uIyniQOgtcIAKNpQYzPXesXwgXLGdwKL8zGQH8u3yH7 SLs3TJiH8osa8vdmtGn0fan8B7CfzJgT08+UQdMEkyPq4unwXj9tyXDoB1cXuzAb Y+C6ya30WnZ2d1pkKyf1Dk5LoWDLvMewVkXFJwBy8xQXFXtWiaJpNHUa3QfiyIC8 kHOG9giyWWxfk0mAyScK0cb0oBz8k7TZ9BA32CDjIoeoxlekVMahny14hH9kFLlI jaFLy3tlwyZ7gir/lKE3wj4Aj4esO+cg3wIZVjvdDT/dB+nLZQk0Z9LLg3zai7oz zkCb72AA4Kb+d84uhMn0iEPlSY+ol9l28a3IlkpfgY//kVSHrtW462I= =vob0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-uOh48f8SrrbVWONMY0m1--