From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2FC5138334 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 21:21:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4DF01E0AE5; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 21:21:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qk1-x742.google.com (mail-qk1-x742.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::742]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE72CE0ABF for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 21:21:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk1-x742.google.com with SMTP id 189so22168620qkj.8 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 13:21:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=G2kNUfw6K4oSmhA8pOmtKrVkTuF55z5/mQkELV4hYas=; b=cJGtu0TJOHNmmmho305EZ695zwCvkGWOAnIPejhPt2dyvmgQe0k6EF+kAqq1NPqagz tLgB87PYcwkuPsXl9cPDbwNMSQ2McCW+8SXECoJhoUWfyutJojGXkMudxsG1Yfxo/bCL qse2SBufHbwIcpXm3ucJEBn6bvnB4RhUdum+nVTdPVjzbMClHrFdJ9sr4EDYdpcABL9S Bt3At7wPNZQEhmQ9SgEjnOabwhdrwWIEaD61q/a2H7IGEg/gAf0XMjxV5icPBzLMc9zP Hlmcsyl3ri4zX8TahGgaiw0DKkdnsvJ2RT8tv2srOdrpLt4H5vIQHPjgxouXwcI8cBTY iAGA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=G2kNUfw6K4oSmhA8pOmtKrVkTuF55z5/mQkELV4hYas=; b=Vs9npKsL7xoI4Jj7x8GW6bqoX8A0hbdIu1vjRFm7EhnyNd9SniCNqG5O7LhzAxAamd hvw9HbL01X01T5G3p4YApxplc7YeIKGbSAbSKBe0avrM4cIC0TM41r5L1SVi7TO+W2kr BNqLij+GUukEbRTlLn1558QygkzoJ2hGSbpCsz2I6w3clB6FnmCS0LcquI4htLXhV3k9 TtwoCIeJv0iGSjkBPEp49IpvXoR8hlgFmO4rWO1RK7BnK2MgdnL6vxYjbNYB7+Lj14wI KgLHQ70pf1v0Bv78lUTQj/zfafrpLVuBWeJvvf2fFsSkMsaLyFxaIooSu8QuXO0Fxvww NiUA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gKcVVBYgjM4ZCCv3es4wX7+V3MO0xRcMVeG4SJEaa+DghdMwpuT HAGJ0AmDrxkG7X3CMdMmZvkVEoYk X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5cXsN2qLBb7ZE9ZKdtG1YU6e14pAGAP1D1oSa1FNaecyAkaahFnsOpKRchPU5l0oohXIJl9TQ== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:b5c8:: with SMTP id o8mr7122665qvf.213.1542144101563; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 13:21:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from whubbs1.gaikai.biz ([100.42.103.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a50sm9597598qtb.38.2018.11.13.13.21.39 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 13 Nov 2018 13:21:40 -0800 (PST) Sender: William Hubbs Received: (nullmailer pid 28768 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 13 Nov 2018 21:21:38 -0000 Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 15:21:38 -0600 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] install-qa-check.d: Support QA{,_STRICT}_INSTALL_PATHS variables (bug 670902) Message-ID: <20181113212138.GA28564@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20181112203344.611-1-zmedico@gentoo.org> <2f93eb4a-0fdf-ac1f-d40d-81a3b6a944e9@gentoo.org> <3260d441-53d5-3016-958a-d961af9f7ded@gentoo.org> <8b5289cf-2829-33b3-9d01-9461a3066b3e@gentoo.org> <56c1caef-048c-9f75-9e31-d009d934bce5@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Archives-Salt: eae0fb9e-0c60-49db-ad67-55a8da6816d0 X-Archives-Hash: 85e4f48458ce615467a4ec103ae3af82 --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 01:57:47AM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 11/13/2018 01:21 AM, Zac Medico wrote: > >=20 > > What's inherently wrong about nix having a file store under /nix? Is > > this purely about FHS? > >=20 >=20 > It goes against not only the FHS, but against our existing policies and > common sense. There's no reason to expect that path to even be writable. > And nix stores everything there, so if you have / mounted on a smaller > partition with e.g. /home and /var mounted elsewhere, then it's going to > fill the disk up with junk that emerge won't remove for you. I'm with Zac on this, we should install the way upstream directs, or if we have that strong of an aversion to it, we should open a bug upstream to fix it. Thanks, William --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQTVeuxEZo4uUHOkQAluVBb0MMRlOAUCW+tASAAKCRBuVBb0MMRl OEwTAKCKFtE3vc/4cc+ERB7UBihtO9GDNwCfXazBLcuiKFxn943NCFVl4K60HzM= =o8T2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/--