From: Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Portage QA check for FHS/Gentoo policy paths, for top-level dirs and /usr/share/doc
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 10:46:38 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181002104638.c4f7b05522c40b6759622aa6@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1df93cd0-b3e7-56cf-3a29-bfaed2069e02@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1136 bytes --]
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 08:19:29 -0700 Zac Medico wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The ~arch version of portage hs a new QA check that reports installation
> of files outside of directories that have been whitelisted [1]. The
> current whitelist includes:
>
> directories common to / and /usr
> ================================
> bin lib lib32 lib64 libx32 sbin
>
> top level directories
> ================================
> boot dev etc opt srv usr var
>
> /usr level directories
> ================================
> include libexec share src
>
> /usr/share/doc level directories
> ================================
> /usr/share/doc/${PF}
>
> The first bug report [2] is for qt-core, which installs documentation
> into /usr/share/doc/${PN}-${PV} instead of /usr/share/doc/${PF} (${PF}
> includes ebuild revision such as -r1, -r2, and so on).
Sometimes documentation contains files used at run-time by the
application. Since application is usually not aware of Gentoo
specific revision numbers it is reasonable to install docs in
${PN}-${PV}. Such checks *must* be overrideable.
Best regards,
Andrew Savchenko
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-02 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-01 15:19 [gentoo-dev] RFC: Portage QA check for FHS/Gentoo policy paths, for top-level dirs and /usr/share/doc Zac Medico
2018-10-01 15:34 ` Mike Gilbert
2018-10-01 15:38 ` [gentoo-dev] " Michael Orlitzky
2018-10-01 15:48 ` [gentoo-dev] " Michał Górny
2018-10-01 16:26 ` Zac Medico
2018-10-01 17:23 ` Andreas Sturmlechner
2018-10-01 18:16 ` Michał Górny
2018-10-01 18:23 ` Zac Medico
2018-10-03 16:38 ` Zac Medico
2018-10-03 18:26 ` Michael Orlitzky
2018-10-03 18:29 ` Andreas Sturmlechner
2018-10-03 20:10 ` Michał Górny
2019-01-27 13:58 ` Andreas Sturmlechner
2018-10-01 20:04 ` Sergei Trofimovich
2018-10-01 20:48 ` Zac Medico
2018-10-01 21:45 ` Sergei Trofimovich
2018-10-02 7:46 ` Andrew Savchenko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181002104638.c4f7b05522c40b6759622aa6@gentoo.org \
--to=bircoph@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox