From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FD4C138334 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 09:43:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A1C3BE090F; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 09:43:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4313BE0821 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 09:43:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org (host-85-201-184-151.dynamic.voo.be [85.201.184.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: cedk) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 69351335CDA for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 09:43:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 11:42:23 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?C=C3=A9dric?= Krier To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Removing support for mercurial repos in repositories.xml Message-ID: <20180929094223.5cfyklnj6eu2mwcg@kei> References: <1537735339.14608.7.camel@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="txgvjayyutb4tkbj" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1537735339.14608.7.camel@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Linux User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180512 X-Archives-Salt: af9290b1-bf83-497e-91b7-a5e0652d6c35 X-Archives-Hash: ba722c0eb928528682e2e354f9b021fe --txgvjayyutb4tkbj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2018-09-23 22:42, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > Yes, I could add process timeouts. But small timeouts are going to > break the occasional necessity of cloning big repos, and big timeouts > are going to make little difference when Mercurial starts hanging again. >=20 > If someone really cares about this horrible piece of software, I'd > appreciate patches (preferably going upstream) to make it timeout sanely > when something hangs. Otherwise, I'd like to announce discontinuation > of Mercurial support soon. FYI, I send an email to mercurial list to talk about this issue [1]. And it seems that for HTTP connections there is no timeout on the connection. I'm working to provide to the upstream a solution to be able to configure a timeout. [1] https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial/2018-September/051003= =2Ehtml --=20 C=C3=A9dric Krier --txgvjayyutb4tkbj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iNUEAREKAH0WIQRQ7afp9Q3Eoe2/b7/4P2gtIa6znwUCW69I/18UgAAAAAAuAChp c3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVucGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0NTBF REE3RTlGNTBEQzRBMUVEQkY2RkJGRjgzRjY4MkQyMUFFQjM5RgAKCRD4P2gtIa6z n1KgAP4hvhcO+npACNnMgRKKOV450T/hE2GX/uJwMCtGmxFssQD/eMamqX1go1++ s/cRpdeh3jalcnzmjqJZqUc9hHVqTr4= =yMMG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --txgvjayyutb4tkbj--