From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-85762-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC28D138334
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 25 Aug 2018 11:48:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 23A99E084E;
Sat, 25 Aug 2018 11:48:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9DD2E0831
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 25 Aug 2018 11:48:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wim.jer (jer.xs4all.nl [212.238.182.54])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: jer)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 598BE335C42;
Sat, 25 Aug 2018 11:48:45 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2018 13:48:40 +0200
From: Jeroen Roovers <jer@gentoo.org>
To: Kent Fredric <kentnl@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] use.desc: Improve description of USE=test
Message-ID: <20180825134840.05228e50@wim.jer>
In-Reply-To: <20180825012306.4a9b26a6@katipo2.lan>
References: <20180820143433.27556-1-mgorny@gentoo.org>
<20180820145937.10739-1-mgorny@gentoo.org>
<CADfzvvbsKZJudPMSoOxLYZ8aH+Cbh0Nec3esfN8B-QOkAFod5A@mail.gmail.com>
<1534833968.953.2.camel@gentoo.org>
<CADfzvvZ6qtMZ1oKaV8LN3JvazTzR2y4xiJoiz_nhXvPg4o3u5A@mail.gmail.com>
<153FDB15-8D96-4065-AB16-885D1A5DE87E@gentoo.org>
<3d0204bf-509b-5cf9-251d-9a689b32db26@gentoo.org>
<CAJ0EP41wF_8V5O=uC6jxJov1C6qhx+XyHGE69mtnRF0sxQQsdQ@mail.gmail.com>
<20180825012306.4a9b26a6@katipo2.lan>
Organization: Gentoo Foundation
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 24b462fa-543f-419e-af9e-60a90db13832
X-Archives-Hash: 0c51fe078ec532dbfd5db145024dae87
Hi Kent,
On Sat, 25 Aug 2018 01:23:06 +1200
Kent Fredric <kentnl@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 22:29:29 -0400
> Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> > Setting RESTRICT="!test? ( test )" is generally sufficient.
>
> But that would require setting that virtually *everything* that has
> both tests, and required dependencies for tests.
Oh, 2012 just called.
> Which, in my experience, is practically everything with tests.
>
> To the point it seems like that should be the *default* mechanic, not
> a requirement that everyone pay not to have a randomly broken package.
"
[S]etting FEATUTES=-test USE=-test means rebuilding a lot of the
installed packages. Instead, since USE=test is special already (it
should only affect what happens in src_test(), right?) we might as
well disable the test phase, tell the user in einfo, and be done with
it. We could even write that to vdb so that on the next run, the
package is re-emerged but with src_test() getting run properly this
time.
"
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417675
Kind regards,
jer