From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A54EA138334 for ; Sat, 4 Aug 2018 19:22:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A1F23E0805; Sat, 4 Aug 2018 19:22:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48FE9E023C for ; Sat, 4 Aug 2018 19:22:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [91.246.100.127]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bircoph) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F45C335C9A for ; Sat, 4 Aug 2018 19:22:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2018 22:22:22 +0300 From: Andrew Savchenko To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: mcrypt status (Re: [gentoo-dev] Idea for a new project: gentoo-libs) Message-Id: <20180804222222.fadd52261fa72b9257e94989@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20180804180554.vdzinpcbqsh7s2ol@proprietary-killer> References: <20180623025046.djmsv44moxuqkv6t@proprietary-killer> <20180625075947.03bd4875@computer> <20180804114328.d4b31c885eba7cb98a1b5fd2@gentoo.org> <20180804180554.vdzinpcbqsh7s2ol@proprietary-killer> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA512"; boundary="Signature=_Sat__4_Aug_2018_22_22_22_+0300_PYxIp3pIlFdnTjxh" X-Archives-Salt: 4909a3f8-eb73-4a16-b9c7-1d2679c6f7f6 X-Archives-Hash: 213d95c7a6d0f3c273cd1ba4f05bbbc1 --Signature=_Sat__4_Aug_2018_22_22_22_+0300_PYxIp3pIlFdnTjxh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 4 Aug 2018 13:05:56 -0500 Marty E. Plummer wrote: [...] > It seems that every last person commenting on this is talking mcrypt, > not mhash, which is what I mentioned in the first place. As far as I can > tell, these are entirely differnt projects which just happen to have a > similar name. Yes, they are. But it this very case I'm interested in mcrypt status, not mhash, that's why I changed the subject field of this discussion.=20 Best regards, Andrew Savchenko --Signature=_Sat__4_Aug_2018_22_22_22_+0300_PYxIp3pIlFdnTjxh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE63ZIHsdeM+1XgNer9lNaM7oe5I0FAltl/O4ACgkQ9lNaM7oe 5I1fcQ//ZhjQf+MxXgPIwN1KdgALm1wrLVClSy7tAEQQbQ72Yuup9piBZsoIVUBs jzLLN5XTyHwvHMLqbEXu7Nl0mqYwtbqDd5/qeWgEDDeHZpkXBle/02YKMQFChVu3 1fr6tM8rxaYlTS3II9xNHOHiUjv/9tkEliGVDgIHBUxKTPNaZFSvL/tyqTutdMkT sJY3+rChCaYgXZl8WV5y7iuPQ4nFiLI/che4/cCqiUJSw6jw6/92clN+AvR4bAIh PYeXE8skP/G92QvhMdrDH0idgb9E8XS/cu6p2c3WHZlDivmPBd7XvEoMjyNPwHz2 ZRrdM7lKnUj7e2WPC9m8Zj9lbne2+mj5TmDBEJzUuvliK2UPyPRPimDhg/rqKkZO brqZCQ2o855Y/RuKow5LkIZgYy/JImsWbNT/kOTRsixyNogLupVu96sW8/tWWEH0 iK/vQsr07MrUNuLqV79Qi+w9vD8TyYl440QmQxj303HBdL5sdoK1JCpYs+XAKTIL 4v+8F/e1Vxf5T/Xla7rfk+aVBROVWTXjU9xHJ2mkiyn9YmqqFkJStc3huM4/fnf3 yFUJ3iY4d16f/+hzhBo31wwvBR7XaVziC+1H4Z+Zwrr0t5aC9y2Pui8uxwmMd+w2 EnAX/yVQRVdSyRKk5giDbPbaeZIbGdNLVAWaspX7qsQtvCEgIjg= =0Hzl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sat__4_Aug_2018_22_22_22_+0300_PYxIp3pIlFdnTjxh--