From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAD30138334 for ; Sat, 4 Aug 2018 10:22:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C12FE0831; Sat, 4 Aug 2018 10:22:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34B47E0824 for ; Sat, 4 Aug 2018 10:22:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [91.246.100.127]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bircoph) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 01107335C29 for ; Sat, 4 Aug 2018 10:22:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2018 13:22:11 +0300 From: Andrew Savchenko To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: mcrypt status Message-Id: <20180804132211.c587a55149aae09aaaf55981@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20180623025046.djmsv44moxuqkv6t@proprietary-killer> <20180625075947.03bd4875@computer> <20180804114328.d4b31c885eba7cb98a1b5fd2@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA512"; boundary="Signature=_Sat__4_Aug_2018_13_22_11_+0300_ZWCmoGGqeQsJ8=Pw" X-Archives-Salt: cac781d9-e154-4c1f-ae8c-916223e26162 X-Archives-Hash: b932cb5435d483fdcd246a38dc8b8974 --Signature=_Sat__4_Aug_2018_13_22_11_+0300_ZWCmoGGqeQsJ8=Pw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 4 Aug 2018 09:51:14 +0000 (UTC) Martin Vaeth wrote: > Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > > > Actually for local symmetric encryption this is the best tool I > > know. >=20 > What is the advantage over gpg --symmetric? 1) mcrypt has wider range of algorithms, including gost which I need. 2) gpg-agent sometimes causes too much trouble (by being enforced in gpg2) and I like it more to enter passphares without any agents. xterm can grab screen and that is sufficient for my needs. Other than that gpg -s in nice and good tool. Best regards, Andrew Savchenko --Signature=_Sat__4_Aug_2018_13_22_11_+0300_ZWCmoGGqeQsJ8=Pw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE63ZIHsdeM+1XgNer9lNaM7oe5I0FAltlflMACgkQ9lNaM7oe 5I18kA//ZM6oQ2Gd9ax804BHkLVU5qQO9ygJmwBhmAww3wE5N3Ben3jW5cTi/Xx4 LLAHH7zmucT0I06K4sTjEmKHnM8D67qDH1P4IXLn0Vyf+zabjyOEUajoW3XkTlAJ gCJqLTdxG9mbDRvl4iFAlGSEYy3ifRhyV+4DrsN2hkMWNi929OlraqhbL7BmmHqC +DIqi6J1FAwjFupmiC7BlbLZsvyhSfb5nrSrWYqy6UE/Z2X/OZuWOAENPBmdHTZs CKq11U+sjn3g1EFpaPYH3YvrQq3s1lrFM+Sp2+V7wcJ6a5kR3IC2az+V8xiuim2w kamlGvk4Z2Ainh9AmGqj911GDQaay1JNNcYMFy5SzNufXWza8kmWQmBKMEyK3fCX 2+xgAusmYhiZEpXKZS/ZKi8OlEL1D7KqZotggCi9hbt3KBQvz0tQyZc5Y6m/eEaU ZlgzTYQxFTAqOAk1q3PJeQ61Iw/Zl8FWtN5XKX95mStdWaBbJ0CYzQQi2P/Mjpxb Yq0ZosYfrMmt/nDTbWUKuPlY1H3SbfWTgyXIvJ2Bvjxt3kPLK0RdkAUiN+pn/GfW v0f4aixZDbBzNcIL9f6OV4uTQXoRRjbiqe08Ymn18A/Mc7MUzJszGJ36cMUhl/IA lYo6FlvgGE/XM/euhUKvD+GoX0mDt878scIyYbj9Jn9NOePKPGI= =FgZA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sat__4_Aug_2018_13_22_11_+0300_ZWCmoGGqeQsJ8=Pw--