From: Brian Dolbec <dolsen@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: moving default location of portage tree (was: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-07-29)
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 08:06:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180727080605.34cdafc7@professor-x> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23387.11443.914440.270167@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1838 bytes --]
On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 16:31:15 +0200
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018, Corentin “Nado” Pazdera wrote:
>
> > July 27, 2018 4:07 PM, "William Hubbs" <williamh@gentoo.org>
> > wrote:
>
> >> Section 5.5.2 describes the directory structure of /var/cache.
> >> These paths are all optional [1].
> >>
> >> /var/cache/fonts
> >> /var/cache/man
> >> /var/cache/www
> >> /var/cache/<package>
> >>
> >> Gentoo isn't a package, so I don't think /var/cache/gentoo/* is
> >> appropriate. Here is my proposal:
> >>
> >> /usr/portage -> /var/db/repos/gentoo
> >> /usr/portage/distfiles -> /var/cache/portage/distfiles
> >> /usr/portage/packages -> /var/cache/portage/binpkgs
> >>
> >> I'm not 100% comfortable with /var/db, but I don't have any better
> >> suggestion either.
> >>
> >> [1]
> >> http://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_3.0/fhs-3.0.html#varcacheApplicationCacheData
>
> > From the same source
> > "No other requirements are made on the data format of the cache
> > directories."
> > And as you have quoted it, everything under /var/cache is
> > optional.
>
> > So anything which doesn't conflict with another package seems fine
> > according to FHS.
>
> That's how I would read it, too. We could of course invent a package
> name (like "package-manager" for virtual/package-manager) but it seems
> cumbersome, and I don't see any benefit of it.
>
> There also is /var/cache/fonts, so the FHS itself lists an example of
> a directory that's not named after a specific package.
>
> Ulrich
/var/db/repos/gentoo
/var/cache/distfiles
/var/cache/binpkgs
Works for me, just please keep "portage" out of it, after all distfiles
are not restricted to portage use only, and neither are binpkgs. There
is alternate binpkg installers.
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 981 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-27 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <23368.25818.481969.336756@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
[not found] ` <20180713065734.63627e6f@professor-x>
[not found] ` <23368.58952.48436.482420@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
[not found] ` <CAGfcS_=2+uDShmA=RapCnmfMCRJVOa5Z04jZFkVhejX0JrY-ow@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <23368.64354.849449.669215@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
[not found] ` <CAGfcS_k2JO_MtEK4GRYzJ2Q2+LxVUEa-iKR_D_bH1EzsfNv6vg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <23369.2669.259722.764432@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
2018-07-18 9:55 ` [gentoo-dev] rfc: moving default location of portage tree (was: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-07-29) Ulrich Mueller
2018-07-18 10:06 ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2018-07-18 12:02 ` Rich Freeman
2018-07-18 13:30 ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-07-18 13:56 ` Rich Freeman
2018-07-18 15:37 ` Christopher Head
2018-07-19 7:07 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: moving default location of portage tree Ulrich Mueller
2018-07-19 20:08 ` [gentoo-dev] rfc: moving default location of portage tree (was: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-07-29) Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2018-07-27 8:32 ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-07-27 8:40 ` Michał Górny
2018-07-29 19:54 ` Matt Turner
2018-07-27 14:06 ` William Hubbs
2018-07-27 14:20 ` Corentin “Nado” Pazdera
2018-07-27 14:31 ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-07-27 15:06 ` Brian Dolbec [this message]
2018-07-29 18:56 ` Michał Górny
2018-07-29 20:16 ` [gentoo-dev] rfc: moving default location of portage tree Ulrich Mueller
[not found] ` <CACVg971M=+VATAFBwL=i9FDh=1=d-vnqPLkMyV-EnyyBZyWAYg@mail.gmail.com>
2018-07-29 19:49 ` [gentoo-dev] rfc: moving default location of portage tree (was: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-07-29) Ulrich Mueller
2018-07-29 19:56 ` Matt Turner
2018-07-29 20:01 ` Rich Freeman
2018-07-29 20:04 ` M. J. Everitt
2018-07-29 20:31 ` Matt Turner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180727080605.34cdafc7@professor-x \
--to=dolsen@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox