From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BB211382C5 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 15:16:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A7BC9E099F; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 15:16:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qk0-x229.google.com (mail-qk0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A4C1E08FE for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 15:16:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-x229.google.com with SMTP id b198so9344128qkg.9 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 08:16:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=beI0ePggdHDt/H4wHdqh/nzL/QroEbEQB8elqrDLwOk=; b=MSuT0vhiOmQ2zQoA04n2AYlPTUSYIJeb1x0R30f7GHldScojh7rf/oXcqC7MWHXvG4 BdzyM/9Hxa/7h6mPR50EGC5dX0EwXiHgpeI3Jpomwc+/Nnn2iMNa014i1ilN7gJM/yD9 gV3Z2bDKefyGhIPWLSMgYK2CoFPJAjPBRYex31HdfWyfrAABykNInJ89UMXFP3v8R+g2 i3nUMMJDwwaaqKk+NRdijfAW7NQnUuphYErhY5ofE5Xm1lCxBQ6zAWA7fCFo7L/TjilI 1pSIZJwe8/1u/7Ru5/CgjarqGSvpgIJYbep0ZuqXXUx27CxZeMC0/P7TtmKJmklsjFzR ugkA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=beI0ePggdHDt/H4wHdqh/nzL/QroEbEQB8elqrDLwOk=; b=tAiHQHIZxpu+mYs56PsFaUFwvbvbgYJWRwI5Heu2LwQRB1i4ExRBZOGrNZcmfP70wG WwaWvHflFLJycJtx40UH1g0nh3hls4+8Zc6SZ+5khIJSzaF/6Du1T7J2RACINU+ku892 gHBuIkiS8D5M/nseN6h24Hnx3g24JEza+1cjQqu/fbzSeJPJZf9ystT6nhoQ3A3cnfgh 7sbwmLzhzaSlDi3bET+exKe85+0+A83o4NINLAy92NgZoqmOMYRQi/2Q3ZglJMEoUqax Aqv/WNyMeJsvzRw4Wjctwnk2itTCDS2vweBlWAaZ1B/2xqjFgSb3+kJFEd9F7UllMtE6 m8iA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tCHdGqb2NcNRNfGd9y41bl3TmAPNxEkDjc+X/L2A2S9JMqlzmqB n+D57i1jWtU7qlnQUSKs9Pt0sA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/EwdDDZXOGxLa6Z7gXqujfeYhmFfvmWssX0Ney9eEQ1v8guMOVRoaint982KQSsuKIOZdMNw== X-Received: by 10.55.165.213 with SMTP id o204mr17144416qke.289.1522422971772; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 08:16:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from whubbs1.gaikai.biz ([100.42.103.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 20sm7892740qkw.75.2018.03.30.08.16.10 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 30 Mar 2018 08:16:11 -0700 (PDT) Sender: William Hubbs Received: (nullmailer pid 24021 invoked by uid 1000); Fri, 30 Mar 2018 15:16:10 -0000 Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 10:16:10 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: app-portage/repoman/ Message-ID: <20180330151610.GA23999@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1522384205.3f04d4d93d00afa5242a0c9459487c9eea7e9a6f.zmedico@gentoo> <0C010DA2-202F-4CC9-BB45-652BA482D32B@gentoo.org> <19AE7C31-3DED-4932-B7AE-CE446E3C09ED@gentoo.org> <77b65662-b9ff-483b-83fd-6fb6e5b1fb53@gentoo.org> <3F4226A7-F313-4F5E-A1D4-E3DF363C3007@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wac7ysb48OaltWcw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F4226A7-F313-4F5E-A1D4-E3DF363C3007@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) X-Archives-Salt: 9a3a14f8-c3b3-4666-be06-01837e115df7 X-Archives-Hash: d019ffc50e67157295ccb6415643ea01 --wac7ysb48OaltWcw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 12:42:09PM +0200, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > Dnia 30 marca 2018 11:01:33 CEST, Zac Medico napisa= =C5=82(a): > >On 03/30/2018 01:42 AM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > >> Dnia 30 marca 2018 09:07:03 CEST, Zac Medico > >napisa=C5=82(a): > >>> On 03/29/2018 10:20 PM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > >>>> Dnia 30 marca 2018 06:30:14 CEST, Zac Medico > >>> napisa=C5=82(a): > >>>>> commit: 3f04d4d93d00afa5242a0c9459487c9eea7e9a6f > >>>>> Author: Zac Medico gentoo org> > >>>>> AuthorDate: Fri Mar 30 04:18:05 2018 +0000 > >>>>> Commit: Zac Medico gentoo org> > >>>>> CommitDate: Fri Mar 30 04:30:05 2018 +0000 > >>>>> URL: =20 > >>>>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=3D3f04d4d9 > >>>>> > >>>>> app-portage/repoman: version bump to 2.3.8 > >>>>> > >>>>> This release adds support for plugin module systems. > >>>>> > >>>>> See: > >>> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Portage/Repoman-Module-specs > >>>>> Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.27_p1, Repoman-2.3.8 > >>>> > >>>> Please revert this immediately. This was never finished, had open > >>> concerns that were never addressed and the added Gentoo repository > >>> files were never subject to proper RFC/review that was requested. > >>> > >>> I've disabled this feature by default, and hidden it behind an > >>> --experimental-repository-modules=3D option. > >>=20 > >> That isn't going to work for me. Given that the yml files were added > >to repository without prior discussion, and contrary to the promises > >given by Portage team such discussion hasn't been started before > >merging the changes to master, I'd like to request removing all those > >files and not reintroducing them until Portage team specifies their > >format and brings it to open discussion. > > > >Yeah I agree that the format really needs a proper specification. I've > >gone ahead and removed them: > > > >https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=3Df62e76a1e0202dcf5= 5faa2b0fd9b21a1cd184dc8 >=20 > Thanks. I hope this will let us start with a clean slate towards making a= good format. If there is some distro policy that this repoman enhancement violated, that's fine and I would like to know about it, but I'm not aware of it. If there isn't, as far as I know, there is no reason for it to be blocked. Thanks, William --wac7ysb48OaltWcw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQTVeuxEZo4uUHOkQAluVBb0MMRlOAUCWr5UtAAKCRBuVBb0MMRl OCNMAJ9Fb9Eniang/Uazg4I/EYWt/WcGYgCgia753QUYY4AKxQqdBOkLX4LhBJk= =byA/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wac7ysb48OaltWcw--