From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E0EB1382C5 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 01:41:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1DC9FE0B43; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 01:41:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE73BE0B0E for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 01:41:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from katipo2.lan (unknown [203.86.205.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kentnl) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D3279335C0B for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 01:41:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 14:41:15 +1300 From: Kent Fredric To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [pre-GLEP] Split distfile mirror directory structure Message-ID: <20180130144115.7462329c@katipo2.lan> In-Reply-To: <23149.51723.451416.236147@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <1517009079.31015.3.camel@gentoo.org> <23149.41634.800359.851461@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <1517134582.1270.12.camel@gentoo.org> <23149.42112.283910.738763@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <1517136016.1270.14.camel@gentoo.org> <23149.51723.451416.236147@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.1-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/K+H=lDAlRmTovG52S4i/2kf"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 924dfb16-1492-4e2f-bf65-2887c7b7310c X-Archives-Hash: 6e019e7634f38a2b680d0f2d9bddaa37 --Sig_/K+H=lDAlRmTovG52S4i/2kf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 28 Jan 2018 14:03:07 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > How about "consecutive non-negative integer keys"? "Unsigned" ? --Sig_/K+H=lDAlRmTovG52S4i/2kf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEPZazbI/qrFT1o9rn6FQySxNmqCAFAlpvzUgACgkQ6FQySxNm qCCq7A/9GlO0hwFPkGO1aJfQUlcbSdwcmhz9rerTF28D99DdjTLFUFnqD9IxCicg dBLYlq/4dXWKl7luKG0s/R7uk+vS9iIihd8dGXBTQ4i6FNTD/ifsa0QAB36UJ+rP I8drPCky82mwEiy7jgMgy8er4XcMxis+o37P0PrS/bv5X9fYhZm1h9XurqFZqSzu yO9D+otYkLLpiwgyhOytLmDkwtoG/769AgmnuMBLxXVS8KFxnQaGpYN5pCphcAty Cm/9Sb8WPwmuGLYZXq31oDFNFAdngRLsfiangxdQiv+yFVSZk3m3aKzjwGUBP/27 Zrtu3DVDdlMomCVewjOYs67XwLmRjYORSBV7Uej/84G1um1KbkRj/V+HPU0uaHVq P7sEwGDNH3RqzbqGJKQfEhgAsgD7fVYM8d6DLW29c7DkgtC85eWJNVzCcD/n+Ajq +hnNuP49A3JA4VE/2UjWFimP9mP47QlaDf4SgFSbkvM4MoST0O/C5pw054j+iyiG XjBIIp/MJTwgC1YoNHg7k+02iGaPRXKCx9IxRk+OujIMjz/rdQIFIFAfGWIgNXmJ 3L9qMRRIFkaClpvsqdA8+NPlF3SQlPhNG3R8HZiVbrDELi3H+11hKEpHmPC6xsXR 0ADjcMLZrMSNmx05N8h9MT/yyu0mGpPDalpT2tTc4R15RlAQs+o= =431N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/K+H=lDAlRmTovG52S4i/2kf--