From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-83620-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F7E91382C5
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 14:49:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A976EE086A;
	Thu, 25 Jan 2018 14:49:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D7C8E07D3
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 14:49:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (unknown [63.142.135.68])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: titanofold)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 69463335C31
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 14:49:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id E832B7399310; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 09:49:25 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 09:49:25 -0500
From: "Aaron W. Swenson" <titanofold@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [News item review] Portage rsync tree verification
 (v2)
Message-ID: <20180125144925.GA5864@gengoff>
Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: <1516874667.1833.4.camel@gentoo.org>
 <1516883717.1833.10.camel@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1516883717.1833.10.camel@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26)
X-Archives-Salt: a5586579-5f8c-45dc-becc-8aa032a59656
X-Archives-Hash: fd28b57f559d716c1994cbb7d5746468


--r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2018-01-25 13:35, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote:
> Display-If-Installed: <sys-apps/portage-2.3.21

Don't we want to tell people using >=3D2.3.22 this same information?

I know we don=E2=80=99t have expires, yet. How about making it
<sys-apps/portage-2.3.30?

--r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iNUEAREKAH0WIQRPTtQ2xj0Ap7RjpAAol2NzYdYtXQUCWmnudV8UgAAAAAAuAChp
c3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVucGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0NEY0
RUQ0MzZDNjNEMDBBN0I0NjNBNDAwMjg5NzYzNzM2MUQ2MkQ1RAAKCRAol2NzYdYt
XQdnAP9yOLhVbzZ58eLNm4JNBLOYBvwifUIf7SmSMRifpp+PtwD9F6iw2DYaYuIR
COfOeOC/x2h+IHWKlhaoGu3AdST2zlE=
=rfB6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3--