From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70E90138330 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 19:54:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D592E08F7; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 19:54:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qk0-x22f.google.com (mail-qk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB142E08B1 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 19:54:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id i141so5885463qke.0 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 11:54:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=/k7o0m7s8j1wyfPe1YCTluxBSDbIY4sS4nUHHIwivIE=; b=QlNblAcPqTQDK80W9UlDHmKg3ortyfV0VrZGjmwrqN0GCOOICiXusW5y9/Hwf/nnEf KLU3Qaoljun4WeSKbkvM09AhPAajUDIOgAdZNmL7VowKJLa20iCQ4SCOfHU3+wRGaQMg 7/f8kquPyJijo9EQJBq1xXX1thv1M6oMO6iSDK5qsgG4J8gtvFAt/UFx6OS2Peyo4rpv jAE3jJyxqu3onnE3WHc+JfYNUdMehLf8J+KPKNggO6HpgPmvuv8WxIXiVJtXgioVNDXE DpOI70A4MnAZhOBZkfioa9eFUsOeVirGApYDiguiS2g63Ywi5BWcdGt1GLtmTgLOW82/ L6vA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=/k7o0m7s8j1wyfPe1YCTluxBSDbIY4sS4nUHHIwivIE=; b=pawHS8DLt0/jXv1EzxtD69NfixiksDLQw6UYBNVQG0AE1eMGjGf/SZqak5KMCnkCFy anYA2kFMhjHKGT/O7hFsiS0PMAiXz7msxtalFsu1GuNFxE2bOUVSFnE8VcQ1F4LUZaqI VdbPK7Yp73DV4rdvm9eX3V055gwFHLB7yH9TMmSJUMKPV2wMOp/b/I2LdPa8e39as7bu hw2ZNlR54MDyY52UDSB0lAub3xVAvMfr7l/xx8uFdSana1qf3cWlDDhbjscl65EeVS0Z yJo0cbWbWFGMP8SD/jmtDxYZpFGqnu2Yxjcvv9wSH+QXHGcEABoH76oxrOWu1Hv4aWu3 T12g== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytcYIlFGJJI2w+y/QN0majxA5X+lJI5D41z8UdZbhvN+DlkghvwV MRWPgQckty0j7XLGu0hmmNN9Bw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBovgmLd4qcn4P4qjwYOu9o3qllKwkCINelFHYF6pNP0eGsr+j5NpmgXhaiE/vp9aCcMn8VcUNA== X-Received: by 10.55.153.67 with SMTP id b64mr33586307qke.70.1515700476095; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 11:54:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from whubbs1.gaikai.biz ([100.42.103.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d50sm1232139qtd.38.2018.01.11.11.54.35 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 11 Jan 2018 11:54:35 -0800 (PST) Sender: William Hubbs Received: (nullmailer pid 7223 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 11 Jan 2018 19:54:34 -0000 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 13:54:34 -0600 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Upcoming posting restrictions on the gentoo-dev mailing list Message-ID: <20180111195434.GA7169@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1685019.DAF74n7IXa@pinacolada> <87d12hkrkm.fsf@proton.d.airelinux.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87d12hkrkm.fsf@proton.d.airelinux.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) X-Archives-Salt: 2048d412-0c24-438a-985d-e6f416592522 X-Archives-Hash: 6fde23e52d1c3ff14a366745ffbbf335 --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 12:22:17PM +0900, Benda Xu wrote: > Hi, >=20 > "Andreas K. Huettel" writes: >=20 > > If, as a non-developer, you want to participate in a discussion on=20 > > gentoo-dev,=20 > > - either reply directly to the author of a list mail and ask him/her to= =20 > > forward your message, >=20 > With this item in mind, shall we set the default "Reply-To:" to the > author instead of the list? +1 Technically, lists should never mess with the reply-to header since the author of the email should set it. I have said multiple times that we should stopp munging reply-to on all of our lists, and the IETF has defined reply-to as a field the author should set. William --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQTVeuxEZo4uUHOkQAluVBb0MMRlOAUCWlfA8wAKCRBuVBb0MMRl OJ/gAKCX96cZQRhF4q2zQGxSYfz6hUwvFgCdE1/95/S/gVG+j+8TPuOfCR8OQuE= =P/I/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV--