From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A716B138330 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 17:19:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 82DF9E0923; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 17:19:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from foo.stuge.se (foo.stuge.se [212.116.89.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD4F6E0909 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 17:19:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14635 invoked by uid 1000); 11 Jan 2018 17:07:22 -0000 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 17:07:22 +0000 From: Peter Stuge To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming posting restrictions on the gentoo-dev mailing list Message-ID: <20180111170722.GH4167@stuge.se> References: <1685019.DAF74n7IXa@pinacolada> <1515578019.1284.3.camel@gentoo.org> <5a6d0b738c950857218087ea2fcde59d@thetys-retz.net> <75813970.FGjmUEszTi@pinacolada> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <75813970.FGjmUEszTi@pinacolada> X-Archives-Salt: 11111cc7-8007-4a31-9578-512de0946f60 X-Archives-Hash: 25ec145fc1df141bba41a440aa9de119 Maybe this is a discussion for -project, then? Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > a few outside trolls who > * keep pushing their personal agenda in endless threads, > * confuse their own inability to contribute with being a mistreated underdog, > * and keep commenting opinionated on technical things they plainly have no > clue about (while whining when are told they sprout bulls##t). .. > Andreas K. Hüttel .. > (council, toolchain, perl, libreoffice, comrel) You Sir are IMHO neither fit for the office of council nor of comrel, solely based on your communication style in that one mail. I would not vote for you, and would vote against you if that's even possible. //Peter