[gentoo-dev] Packages looking for proxy as ian no longer has commit access

[gentoo-dev] Packages looking for proxy as ian no longer has commit access

[Pacho Ramos]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 321 bytes --]

Due https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99016 ian doesn't
have commit access and, then, his packages need a proxy maintainer:
app-portage/autounmask
app-portage/demerge

Ian, if you want to completely remove yourself from maintaining any
package, please told us so.

Thanks for taking them










[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages looking for proxy as ian no longer has commit access

[Ulrich Mueller]

>>>>> On Thu, 24 Nov 2011, Pacho Ramos wrote:

> Due https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99016 ian doesn't
> have commit access and, then, his packages need a proxy maintainer:
> app-portage/autounmask
> app-portage/demerge

I would volunteer to proxy maintain these packages, if Christian still
wants to be maintainer for them (his last commit was in 2009). If not,
proxy maintainership doesn't make much sense.

Ulrich

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages looking for proxy as ian no longer has commit access

[Paul Varner]

On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 17:25 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, 24 Nov 2011, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> 
> > Due https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99016 ian doesn't
> > have commit access and, then, his packages need a proxy maintainer:
> > app-portage/autounmask
> > app-portage/demerge
> 
> I would volunteer to proxy maintain these packages, if Christian still
> wants to be maintainer for them (his last commit was in 2009). If not,
> proxy maintainership doesn't make much sense.
> 

Ulrich,

If we decide to proxy maintain these two packages, go ahead and add
tool-portage as the herd to back you up.

Regards,
Paul