From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68AAB1396D9 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 07:52:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8AFF82BC070; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 07:52:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 400652BC007 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 07:52:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from katipo2.lan (unknown [203.86.205.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kentnl) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6543533C1EB for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 07:52:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 20:51:43 +1300 From: Kent Fredric To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: news item for the 17.0 profiles Message-ID: <20171010205143.34b132db@katipo2.lan> In-Reply-To: <1528131.eIYCIZq90I@pinacolada> References: <1528131.eIYCIZq90I@pinacolada> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.1-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/ah7lzSYtVYdjA_ZKOebAI1v"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: a026d25c-08c1-4ee1-adce-4ec45ce94c8a X-Archives-Hash: 34ce4dcea57700461578d11612ee3690 --Sig_/ah7lzSYtVYdjA_ZKOebAI1v Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 09 Oct 2017 22:58:22 +0200 "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote: > Please consider switching from your current 13.0 profile to the > corresponding 17.0 profile soon after GCC-6.4.0 has been=20 > stabilized on your architecture. The 13.0 profiles will be deprecated=20 > and removed in the near future. Just a question that only became apparent to me as I'm trying to create a "mostly stable" keyworded chroot, but with this change added to pick up defects: Are there any specific versions of toolchain modules that should/must be us= ed in 17.0 to make it work with GCC-6.4.0? All I did was: - Forcibly create the profile symlink myself ( as its not visible to me yet with eselect ) - accept-keywords for gcc - Followed remaining instructions. And hopefully that should be sufficient. binutils: 2.28.1 gcc: 6.4.0 glibc: 2.23-r4 libtool: 2.4.6-r3 I know this is typically a "don't mix ~arch and arch" thing, but I can't actually test things that will break otherwise :p --Sig_/ah7lzSYtVYdjA_ZKOebAI1v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEPZazbI/qrFT1o9rn6FQySxNmqCAFAlncfB4ACgkQ6FQySxNm qCAqvw//ZkfGe9Y3Jc7RMlO3c2V9gP3amdpjAScYhxb/KFPeR8e2gKGHjZ9eUCjg TeMyHj23PSeANMf3cxGj1F07mo1cJkNKi+KefMMj4ftn/JClBTF4is+rGJRDjl5f /OR7BqqZ400z/8dNvovokr/+RKjR8KxbMh3XN+hEsVSJq6Y5WGsNMc+1DbRSeO9e JxC1xgtWHFbA/z6Bd+Q5B4PUN0iqFS9BOw0c2aZzkQhXJYqtNbufHXjQNFrBUyAw ZNm9lYVsmguq/lE3DHh8rmcWMgKLcN3Ons50GiZXjrjiUjDu4pgiUulsRJFcAhow WR2SkYBTfRzFKc0RHYKTwLzrqiNhPUXQKkSnPtlXbnS9H1pV4ka/5IeLvLh/ycb1 LcxJFgBzUdEskkcI9JtbXsUZJbJheLv3uQHUz5sMPBPhnkiXWOf5LfFDSdI8cKBy xPGkMmIlrnIyvu3as92tVT4MSR3quwsBYV+cPOTa3wli8ThWYjLjvIR+1NgbEo7r cSfQbOdowiq1Uc5K+vT7WCptiAUHJjP7V5JO1FinTmaVZkHIQWnbirIP+idAPBcj gtqy9uVTVRk1bW74eEBO7C2OYY5rgQdJpY/UiIGE5WjP5Cu2kgncbEn58N/UJxxp 541f81FU+MxCKfukgJYaANLE+uEhVDu8A6zH85aB0DJaxqUIZ9Q= =et+U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/ah7lzSYtVYdjA_ZKOebAI1v--