From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-82153-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D3721396D0
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 07:43:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 283431FC0AE;
	Mon, 11 Sep 2017 07:43:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE7DE1FC051
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 07:43:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from sf (host81-129-83-128.range81-129.btcentralplus.com [81.129.83.128])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: slyfox)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3BB7D3417DD;
	Mon, 11 Sep 2017 07:43:25 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 08:43:13 +0100
From: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>
To: bman@gentoo.org, gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] On dropping sparc@ from CC on bugs
Message-ID: <20170911084313.2cf9f40e@sf>
In-Reply-To: <bug-621130-3398-g5w8kj8DWg@http.bugs.gentoo.org/>
References: <bug-621130-3398@http.bugs.gentoo.org/>
	<bug-621130-3398-g5w8kj8DWg@http.bugs.gentoo.org/>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.1-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 boundary="Sig_/ESL00cRQ6=T3bvtgDOQgtHH"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Archives-Salt: d42871d7-e65d-486a-925a-562565b514ba
X-Archives-Hash: d875b8b46ea99ac23e60a8c2e52af0cd

--Sig_/ESL00cRQ6=T3bvtgDOQgtHH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 22:18:08 +0000
bugzilla-daemon@gentoo.org wrote:

> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the person
> whose email is mentioned below. To comment on this bug, please visit:
>=20
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D621130
>=20
> Aaron Bauman <bman@gentoo.org> changed:
>=20
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---
>                  CC|sparc@gentoo.org            |
>=20
> --- Comment #16 from Aaron Bauman <bman@gentoo.org> ---
> sparc was dropped to exp.
>=20
> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=3Db5901d8f716555a147=
9f12313a2925fcadd177a9

[ CCed gentoo-dev@ to raise general awareness ]

Why do you need to drop sparc@ from CC on all the bugs?

It takes away possibility from users using sparc@ to report
test status easily. Even after the bug is closed.

sh@ and s390@ are also exp profiles and CC is one of mechanisms
to ask arch teams to try keywording/stablereq.

--=20

  Sergei

--Sig_/ESL00cRQ6=T3bvtgDOQgtHH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: Цифровая подпись OpenPGP

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iF0EARECAB0WIQSZKa0VG5avZRlY01hxoe52YR/zqgUCWbY+kgAKCRBxoe52YR/z
qm5AAJ9uc/Hp7KiSbGAUKN9SDfRnXykH8gCfcDezL2fnBfQmn1YK924MwA0+pBs=
=6g7v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/ESL00cRQ6=T3bvtgDOQgtHH--