From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49D2D1396D0 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:54:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AEE241FC06D; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:54:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A2771FC002 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:54:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix, from userid 2274) id 50DA13417B0; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 08:54:24 -0400 From: Tim Harder To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing PMS to Portage Manager Specification Message-ID: <20170816125424.GA1932@localhost> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <36fd7740-c0c9-5957-0e6b-38b5fd50bba0@gentoo.org> <9a8b2756-deb9-4562-1f44-828992d4c94d@gentoo.org> <22932.5809.816983.485483@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <22932.5809.816983.485483@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) X-Archives-Salt: 23a0f7ce-cc60-49ca-8225-8ebd6ee5e918 X-Archives-Hash: f7986664b8d76584b020d020a17e963f On 2017-08-16 05:56, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > Considering it says exactly the same for EAPI 5, this is almost > > certainly a mistake - but I'd rather confirm this here before > > changing the page. > Unfortunately, information about EAPI 4 and 5 support is not entirely > clear from the NEWS file, so one must look into the git log. Quoting > bug 326459 comment 4 [1]: > EAPI 4: pkgcore-0.6.5 (2011-06-22), which is the first version > (correctly) supporting default src_install. There's another change > for EAPI 4 in 0.7, namely removal of the AA and KV variables, but I > think this can be ignored here (also it's not in the NEWS file). > EAPI 5: pkgcore-0.9.3 (2016-05-28). NEWS says for 0.9 that it has > "Nearly complete EAPI=5 support just missing subslot rebuilds." > This was finally added in 0.9.3, "Add support for PN:slot/subslot > and slotted glob targets." > So yes, it appears that full support for EAPI 5 was added only in > pkgcore-0.9.3, which supports EAPI 6 already. Just to note, I consider pkgcore-0.9 to support EAPI 5 nearly as far as PMS specifies. The news item you pointed out has more to do with adding subslot input support for cli tools (pmerge, pquery, etc) which doesn't have anything to do with PMS. Tim