From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBDFC1396D0 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 18:25:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC1AB1FC051; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 18:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qt0-x241.google.com (mail-qt0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63A59E0CC7 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 18:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt0-x241.google.com with SMTP id p3so1510432qtg.5 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 11:25:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=a5rdx1y0l63R2+q2JznmaKAFWduHLecVpnMtBlmfPRQ=; b=pL0MvSlSpLl2lnnQqfSu1fBN1Ngd+M+kfGM+0NHfWnwGqjL+8iZhdfd24EJGM+Tnrd 3sfH7x81oZ2dj7lQ9RnYVAe91V3jk1nBilrPkHmzoAdS2ReYu3n9+1+Ba+VyTRRaPzhM ZpnEekAE6c4n22TgdHalbeiZKGVNlXkNxYEyovggmZQt3eYUKrWUVMMG4LdGzaeTMNx7 BchB2L9cJNrxA58jlHQsYYCQTqhowA5a8wJZHRRw9f+oETGOiXLjcjnpDvf473irwK2f lhZ1PSWKkPmGT0oMG62Jy2vrXXW4/S/RFwpMvTVNowjCEbHrwAMPCBGAPWFXR4WSRKNN CQFA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=a5rdx1y0l63R2+q2JznmaKAFWduHLecVpnMtBlmfPRQ=; b=klezzNPi5xBc5rxqmwcbE76zQMSZY1CvOJViwuRwGgrEr7JCVhbRR/zrT5AENs6qc9 iqSIcBFaucnV5zyTXiUfU/cI/5SD6qoiYspWsExsqYCwi/xVELA2oDpeq8MYP+2I6aJL mgbRSKyYCTobNdoOOwcWq6/v0zetiv8OjGyf5ZodP4YIpwTJ/Q5iu22HjlnWu7E+r78y W3zFiES6t+5QaOyNfMFUMhm3It7GE6jRjuGq6dXypZBeqG6lb6zBj+2PC8Uebq8NnQhp 6aH0XxQqYCoQ8NGhKmHzFW2UR/QEPMwda5mUhWB6gjPJuOjMijASoAYYa8M6Q3ME6UYz dWgA== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5iRdQ4u7sNEoah8eVFmvG8yloITKO+bMkFg2K2wSa+qSe2Oj9Rd ynm1ICVwkuZgPE5M X-Received: by 10.200.46.194 with SMTP id i2mr17875565qta.89.1502389534610; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 11:25:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from whubbs1.gaikai.biz ([100.42.103.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d26sm4310323qte.11.2017.08.10.11.25.33 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 10 Aug 2017 11:25:34 -0700 (PDT) Sender: William Hubbs Received: (nullmailer pid 19155 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 10 Aug 2017 18:25:33 -0000 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 13:25:33 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New package neomutt Message-ID: <20170810182533.GA19125@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20170731071119.jccco5q4kd3fs4xs@rubberducky.suse.de> <20170810045857.e6qrvnimteopxgev@rubberducky.suse.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170810045857.e6qrvnimteopxgev@rubberducky.suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) X-Archives-Salt: 58ec00b4-8341-43d7-a632-82a7d8962d9e X-Archives-Hash: ceb7decb39bdd56e86e80da1e667493d --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 06:58:57AM +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I would like to add neomutt to the tree. This new package is meant as=20 > >an alternative and not a replacement of the existing mutt package. >=20 > Thanks for all of the great suggestions and feedback! >=20 > This is round two. I have update the ebuild with all your=20 > suggestions. I have also added support for eselecting between mutt=20 > and neomutt. Before the eselect ebuild can land though, we need to=20 > rename the mutt binary so that the managed link can be called=20 > mutt. I am against the eselect idea. If the binary upstream is neomutt, that is what we should call it, and we should not rename the mutt binary. William --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQTVeuxEZo4uUHOkQAluVBb0MMRlOAUCWYylFwAKCRBuVBb0MMRl OM+UAJ4k8k5zcT5m0k/N41D/bS1tBb2/HQCfUNBaGDfTfuD1E7qfXJiq0H8gD9U= =Lf+U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9--