From: Marc Schiffbauer <mschiff@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New package neomutt
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 14:13:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170810121329.GG9622@schiffbauer.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170810093545.qhgn7iuuxn6l5dfk@rubberducky.suse.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 910 bytes --]
* Nicolas Bock schrieb am 10.08.17 um 11:35 Uhr:
> It does of course. What's appropriate here depends on whether we
> think somebody might want to have both mutt and neomutt installed
> at the same time. If we don't allow this use case, we don't have
> to worry about eselect and the neomutt binary will be called
> 'mutt' (as it is called by upstream already). If we do allow this
> use case, being able to eselect makes sense because then the
> binary is still always called 'mutt'.
Why not just have mutt and/or neomutt for both packages? Whoever only
wants neomutt and run it with 'mutt' can "alias mutt=neomutt" and be
done.
Having en eselect module here is not really KISS and looks a bit like
bloat to me which make things more complicated than they have to be.
Just my 2¢
--
0xCA3E7BF67F979BE5 - F7FB 78F7 7CC3 79F6 DF07
6E9E CA3E 7BF6 7F97 9BE5
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-10 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-31 7:11 [gentoo-dev] New package neomutt Nicolas Bock
2017-07-31 7:23 ` Nicolas Bock
2017-07-31 8:34 ` Patrice Clement
2017-08-10 4:37 ` Nicolas Bock
2017-07-31 12:15 ` Floyd Anderson
2017-08-10 4:34 ` Nicolas Bock
2017-07-31 7:44 ` Michał Górny
2017-07-31 7:59 ` Nicolas Bock
2017-07-31 9:55 ` Matthew Thode
2017-07-31 10:52 ` Fabian Groffen
2017-08-05 20:13 ` Matthew Marchese
2017-08-10 4:58 ` Nicolas Bock
2017-08-10 7:40 ` Michał Górny
2017-08-10 7:54 ` Fabian Groffen
2017-08-10 8:10 ` Michał Górny
2017-08-10 9:35 ` Nicolas Bock
2017-08-10 12:13 ` Marc Schiffbauer [this message]
2017-08-10 12:16 ` Fabian Groffen
2017-08-10 14:09 ` Michał Górny
2017-08-10 14:32 ` Fabian Groffen
2017-08-10 13:59 ` Michał Górny
2017-08-17 5:07 ` Daniel Campbell
2017-08-17 7:48 ` Michał Górny
2017-08-18 1:01 ` Daniel Campbell
2017-09-18 12:02 ` Nicolas Bock
2017-08-10 18:25 ` William Hubbs
2017-09-18 12:08 ` Nicolas Bock
2017-10-03 12:36 ` Nicolas Bock
2017-10-03 20:09 ` Marty E. Plummer
2017-10-03 20:33 ` Nicolas Bock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170810121329.GG9622@schiffbauer.net \
--to=mschiff@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox