From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B87B7139694 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 19:46:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C881E1FC079; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 19:46:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpauths.lb.bluewin.ch (vimdzmsp-sfwd05.bluewin.ch [195.186.120.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ABFD1FC016 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 19:46:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dell-xps13.lan ([77.56.37.128]) by vimdzmsp-sfwd05.bluewin.ch Swisscom AG with SMTP id a5lXd7yEzbp9ha5lXdQA6c; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 21:45:13 +0200 X-Bluewin-Spam-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=GIjFar5K c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=hZe7lLucP2v4/RdKC6iJ9g==:117 a=hZe7lLucP2v4/RdKC6iJ9g==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=7mOBRU54AAAA:8 a=NEAV23lmAAAA:8 a=R3EkEvQj0wUvywwtGAYA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=wa9RWnbW_A1YIeRBVszw:22 X-Bluewin-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-FXIT-IP: IPv4[77.56.37.128] Epoch[1501011913] X-Bluewin-AuthAs: meier_markus@bluewin.ch Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 21:45:11 +0200 From: Markus Meier To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts? Message-ID: <20170725214511.7201f900@dell-xps13.lan> In-Reply-To: <2277691.IQrrNmuQfn@wanheda> References: <20170724222223.6d359e47@sf> <2277691.IQrrNmuQfn@wanheda> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfMb9uzD13DyPNGxafxyJGre94WeLwbnUfbf2dVeLw/I0IodcnY3KCs85Or83Cm9/FKwU1BALO9Q2qW2QEEdayZ8TnuBIITjpnga9GOIikc7NmU4gy2y4 TXdYCjbDaaMePGfGE9Ii66Ar3HpPCxlK0ult0flZYFNUjIjIfStQY2i8ZYKd1nnO3iZpDz127AHBfw== X-Archives-Salt: dd255826-0bd5-4843-97d4-0e8ccb16e4a8 X-Archives-Hash: 4bef6296d25267e6ab873b70498386a3 On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 11:03:30 +0200 Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > On Monday 24 July 2017 22:22:23 Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > > 1. lack of automation > I'd summarize the techical steps into: > 1) get the list of packages > 2) test > 3) commit to git > 4) write on bugzilla > > 1 is done by getatoms https://github.com/kensington/bugbot > 2 is done by the tester in the manner he prefer > 3 no official tool available, I used a modified version of > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/arch-tools.git/tree/batch-stabilize.py > which is still based on CVS > 4 no official tool available, I used my own bash script which calls > pybugz > > So, points 3 and 4 needs to be improved, I have the idea on how the > script should look, but I have no time to do it and no python > knowledge. I can assist everyone that candidate itself to make the > tool/script like I did with kensington when he made getatoms. for 3 and 4 there's the keyword.sh script in my overlay (under scripts) that has been working for ages (at least for me)... Regards, Markus