Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts?

[Markus Meier <maekke@gentoo.org>]

On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 11:03:30 +0200
Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Monday 24 July 2017 22:22:23 Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> > 1. lack of automation  
> I'd summarize the techical steps into:
> 1) get the list of packages
> 2) test
> 3) commit to git
> 4) write on bugzilla
> 
> 1 is done by getatoms https://github.com/kensington/bugbot
> 2 is done by the tester in the manner he prefer
> 3 no official tool available, I used a modified version of 
> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/arch-tools.git/tree/batch-stabilize.py
> which is still based on CVS
> 4 no official tool available, I used my own bash script which calls
> pybugz
>
> So, points 3 and 4 needs to be improved, I have the idea on how the
> script should look, but I have no time to do it and no python
> knowledge. I can assist everyone that candidate itself to make the
> tool/script like I did with kensington when he made getatoms.

for 3 and 4 there's the keyword.sh script in my overlay (under scripts)
that has been working for ages (at least for me)...


Regards,
Markus