From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15FE5139694 for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 17:42:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A5CFE0BF3; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 17:42:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF644E0BDF for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 17:42:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from katipo2.lan (unknown [203.86.205.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kentnl) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E9A143418D7 for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 17:42:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 05:41:59 +1200 From: Kent Fredric To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-client/phantomjs and dev-ruby/poltergeist Message-ID: <20170612054159.03cb321a@katipo2.lan> In-Reply-To: <1497163106.1515.3.camel@gentoo.org> References: <1496646687.9038.9.camel@gentoo.org> <20170605230605.099dfdc3@katipo2.lan> <1496726880.31590.1.camel@gentoo.org> <20170606211124.38b51703@katipo2.lan> <1497163106.1515.3.camel@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/leEA0.6dY8X..ia0qxFapYU"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: c7574f6f-54be-45c8-9580-3852ad6cb374 X-Archives-Hash: 6d60f05dfa50a6f3b5ed5bc2fc785c86 --Sig_/leEA0.6dY8X..ia0qxFapYU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 11 Jun 2017 08:38:26 +0200 Hans de Graaff wrote: > I've updated the proposed timeframe in the mask to 90 days. That's reasonable. Thanks :) --Sig_/leEA0.6dY8X..ia0qxFapYU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEPZazbI/qrFT1o9rn6FQySxNmqCAFAlk9gPQACgkQ6FQySxNm qCAKHRAAxReLx5lpHhLp6H4/m5xc4lYB8UCkDrV8C55r6VNqFSoL4cfpD72D3Lr1 HAl1k2eBvQ7G9guEf5b3E/DGUyWRC+EvtdQ+Idx/uLwTeHrvMfWBk0OCXavblIkw aalQCZEukoUuLW9S9xpe8lwPXkQduX9URwX+sJdjHahsKQnz06HVq5q0x23qYE4j 7MF8VGOtdVLGBBvvGqc0Mo/ItPAgYLVAyvXAxlIWCu+b/5Ehc21KfZ466/fl7WjI huVl31yjXrd2ElwhphxB5MNxxVmolEhVB9JMrUnldMnGEn3VBMg3xYSIH1DoKNnC oONWAOjZ3PQA76AoLCwFDAJxvJtAJzEKeyN1bQmvW2SxE56ygMtddAUWkXdAtTyM g/iDduTmFUHyALOgSt8IGo4EEAnSa2ozmfZ6pI6rfXFKGhVFqNW4Xt16hX2X/xPi odWk9sEkjXvyiOQTLxyAzCUYX7ZLMcw93KY1X9YwBVq3US4IGkrzQm9+MH+rWqtb nmUg50BCANsjdIDl+gWiUJzRl42QEwVRqw5RQ4x4Rw128B9DSk6AwDbpq6gM8+7y 95Rc7m+ip9a+KGOi0HgT8+WicXO26p5yEHzD9YVk2ikHTnLLKY5tSQUL14twPHqN aUBZ787frTf97sPHxk/CWmXOJm881TywCh4itIdTp1GNTuINlKQ= =po/o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/leEA0.6dY8X..ia0qxFapYU--