From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 916F7139694 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 11:36:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC67F21C097; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 11:36:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A411E21C07D for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 11:36:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from red.yakaraplc.local (host213-123-185-55.in-addr.btopenworld.com [213.123.185.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: chewi) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F1DEC341683 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 11:36:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:35:59 +0100 From: James Le Cuirot To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-apps/postfixadmin Message-ID: <20170608123559.72714dbe@red.yakaraplc.local> In-Reply-To: <2244407.TH0DqkcrJL@note> References: <9ab31c6f-7036-dea3-b455-b325bcae65bf@gentoo.org> <2244407.TH0DqkcrJL@note> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 225b25bc-0715-41dc-93f9-736df25370a7 X-Archives-Hash: 6cc932ed98ee8b6dfe8bffb6a288b14d On Thu, 08 Jun 2017 18:18:09 +0700 "Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov" wrote: > Well, actually, I think that whole webapps structure in gentoo should > be dropped or totally rewritten, despite of web applications packages > state in the gentoo repo. > It is unextendable, uncomfortable, no-gentoo-way'ish and so on. > > I think, it would even be better to just install apps > in /usr/share/${PF} than current webapp behaviour. Actually I quite like the way webapp-config works. Some improvements are needed but nothing major. I would particularly like to see nginx configuration snippets dynamically generated for a slightly more out-of-the-box experience. There also doesn't seem to be a way to protect configuration files containing sensitive credentials from local users. -- James Le Cuirot (chewi) Gentoo Linux Developer