From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DD7B139694 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 08:27:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A1C65E0E4B; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 08:27:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 594DEE0E40 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 08:27:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e34:eeaa:6bd0:4ecc:6aff:fe03:1cfc]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: aballier) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 348383417EC for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 08:27:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 10:26:58 +0200 From: Alexis Ballier To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Forced/automatic USE flag constraints (codename: ENFORCED_USE) Message-ID: <20170605102658.6b886bbb@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <1496071993.31087.1.camel@gentoo.org> References: <1496071993.31087.1.camel@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 40c3cca6-4490-4201-aa24-51febaa994e7 X-Archives-Hash: cd4e74c3ea1d66900afe61bbb44a9427 On Mon, 29 May 2017 17:33:13 +0200 Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > 2.4. Backwards compatibility > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D Considering the discussions in that thread, a natural way to move forward now seems to be: 1. Define a way to solve constraints deterministically 2. Get a warning check into repoman to ensure REQUIRED_USE are solved that way. 3. Get those repoman warnings fixed. 4. Implement an optional FEATURES in portage for automatic solving of REQUIRED_USE. 5. If all goes well, mandate that solving in next EAPI and make the repoman warning an error for those EAPIs.