From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-80910-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37C90139694 for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 15:23:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D350E0E72; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 15:22:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9612E0E21 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 15:22:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from katipo2.lan (unknown [203.86.205.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kentnl) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D58534176E for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 15:22:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 03:22:21 +1200 From: Kent Fredric <kentnl@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Addition of a new field <remote-id type="debian"> to metadata.xml Message-ID: <20170603032221.35fd3fe4@katipo2.lan> In-Reply-To: <1496415085.16111.0.camel@gentoo.org> References: <d10a81a9-5c7f-743b-7eea-925de2097ab7@gentoo.org> <20170602130903.334b0d03@katipo2.lan> <2816064.Ipx2b8F6kQ@note> <20170603023827.0d4531fa@katipo2.lan> <1496415085.16111.0.camel@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/KgOD=nGcihLOu.OfEqDb/z_"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: d7cdac67-7ee9-405a-b665-f9a2e0533a29 X-Archives-Hash: e39ae2126b5e95566407c2c7211a726d --Sig_/KgOD=nGcihLOu.OfEqDb/z_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 02 Jun 2017 16:51:25 +0200 Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote: > ...so if a Gentoo package is split into 40 packages in Debian, are you > going to list all of them? If it would be useful to do so, maybe. But its a text file, people are capable of making judgements about adding 3.2k of text, I hope. ( worst-case, 40 lines of 80 characters each ) If the text at that size has a use, then, why not? As long as that 40-package example is an exceptional case, where it was dee= med useful, not the norm. --Sig_/KgOD=nGcihLOu.OfEqDb/z_ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEPZazbI/qrFT1o9rn6FQySxNmqCAFAlkxgroACgkQ6FQySxNm qCAzNRAA0iObS8ChGUPu3wBnM5Dj4/uyzhYTQeskP8FziCrs1EqB5L20z4/0zfZP /vW4FnUDoJycO4aEXgdo96o9hhoNQPNizYh5d4s7D3XsyxB6zqEjLjwmRUEab3m3 qKaBKZWZ5pxAuZVJ1ScSANqsn6L9cqYvRJUsjrRQIX5ic0G3xGwnLPhuhjuQykZW TWcTY3hkHT2eQAH4K49A2JA13LzJb10Y6uMTyxzA9MEbVcD2X78DE9BPZhfh5pLM inOP/7pSMqQ9MAOshjSoQFTbfVFl9dN82dr1j359ZvdzoMtBRogK0KcMLolXUfhU kTcxrd/B+zjz+TDnr2hUDuWwXOR+6tENSiEQXISNkJuJ0p37CPlZ7I/AF8pGrvU7 EamKscEC13u3wTjdqLtj61VhB5k+czx9TvThiQ9DMGfGE/tl6l7iS6wIelmT0DlD LNKP8Hg5lfgfXUFI7L/RyCzDpUrzEOxK/9MvbHfsvkeE/tQussccSTjDsxM3GikA BvDa7OA9sIsik/A+HylTsUXdwRRNm9eiv2Vr3ch3H7dBfPYXEv5ABT/Qw9V5ccct ZeBlDYeIqm2UxFPw7FGMJnm8nL1ErjtTKPNUYDSYMrPyywQzAbx1L90gkvWLsmOd d5Nsg/AogoaQFcmvYFGwjf9QvqzmO890FVVgFCRYb1WPY7M68QQ= =XcRP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/KgOD=nGcihLOu.OfEqDb/z_--