From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09E9A139694 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 01:09:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1DE82E0BF3; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 01:09:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC9B6E0AF0 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 01:09:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from katipo2.lan (unknown [203.86.205.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kentnl) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A188834172D for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 01:09:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 13:09:03 +1200 From: Kent Fredric To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Addition of a new field to metadata.xml Message-ID: <20170602130903.334b0d03@katipo2.lan> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/nxMp5EueRcM9Aj47LFg6V6+"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: b98ca038-13df-462e-897b-c3ca55a75e78 X-Archives-Hash: 6513b6e2fcf3e4e0eef6e5c81bfe8591 --Sig_/nxMp5EueRcM9Aj47LFg6V6+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 23:18:22 +0200 Jonas Stein wrote: > A space separated list of the corresponding debian packages should be > written in the field > Why space separated? Its already legal to specify the field multiple times, and it should work better that way for consistency with things that can already parse XML. That way there's no need to put an additional parser inside our XML extraction. libfoo libfoo-debug No? It also means general purpose XML formatting tools can keep it tidy, _and_ sorted, without having to reinvent new tools. --Sig_/nxMp5EueRcM9Aj47LFg6V6+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEPZazbI/qrFT1o9rn6FQySxNmqCAFAlkwurwACgkQ6FQySxNm qCADmA/+Nox8WW1acGA1g9Cg9y4oel0WaY6evaBiLJ4jjl4L3Yuw9nPNP6BTYPK7 FoDEbbTHTlEjhJzNht/IFcMPFAPyNUY2P4zX9aGdYZLGVAbWCEyPMdDt/XoYuRwW XKhsInSfe37XXRgFBLU+6Rv2UywlHdScHaI7dEHn2TsezIMmpvYMv1i1Ryt4a4bX XnO0LVdbVJf+qJZFuXsyCMrDfGrF2TgUqCnArLA15RmNY4izhBbqIu5EI5UGfFkN 2QX4Xtz2yFXGk9KMsPDkkIH2TVqeQ1UldeaTuApsX1KeRFu9LVHJ4iRJEuHJVoIi 0z+vfUi/rOkw+JcHE/O2sldAnMpI1AjEPhvQyH+Tuge/AcI9kKnj6DsGL+27lgU+ u5tuCKdZ68aPLCTfMQzdYnRLW/Uv6Pxrjr/rcNwxOWhY92gm2OOtfaK6qGAGfaL9 +GnuoSApV2NZp964600YUpYh26FQUy+zSk6oaQM31uhIqebbFnLmwHMvK0LeakQk OkGhKtsg0EkVZ+nhXIAFU5Wt6adD4zt0ADykxVh82maLrgAlRJfuWdcwi2RLgBgf RJ+WNX1abGYcsPNiuaaMh2c45vSV3CQYBnMPevEZhJAJYHwrd2O/6asR4gRbRpKz 3CVoWKl3xc+FaSNG7GJwP6fSxu4XkE8c1bjPEGqrfjwLNOLGp0k= =Zf/C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/nxMp5EueRcM9Aj47LFg6V6+--