From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA48A139694 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 22:53:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B9B4DE0C44; Wed, 31 May 2017 22:52:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-x243.google.com (mail-wm0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DD25E0C2F for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 22:52:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-x243.google.com with SMTP id g15so6984982wmc.2 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 15:52:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=tsuYxwoOKasJtZ3ZNXX4qWMtsG9opXOFxHRp5me9BGo=; b=Sp8uBezqwlZYUiunswyUz0xIM9YrKs8Svdl9p/sFTEZEgPO09WckNx+HentG2waH8N iqkoFMANLtMSy3gmpP1VZn+VpxIYmSCIyc3sGXt8vffzh8iSxa7nR4miBUYRuT4BtJm8 N7S0cxG1SQbqDHlpyP5kKa79Z25+DKmZ7N6pXrUhyjU9WMNOWMR6VF574NaHdbNREoBa iqR7ToK7i8wmvAHfyp5+Q7doOtuUCfxwh/0B6o0BJBVBrZQiauuLgickI++j2beFm1sE PDWlUIz0VNNBgTBgKwIWc5EtGc2r+OyExjfM2gvSLk0R40Y5ES7AfChgY8DeZfrs0zym fsmA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tsuYxwoOKasJtZ3ZNXX4qWMtsG9opXOFxHRp5me9BGo=; b=pVY9xtUa30D9/P02Qkw9lVR3qwgG5UoO4UtG4tVD8/h3tnmF3W6I7sEOAo7K2Grr2c kEjwmYFo8xSOvssXbo70USdPzTdg+E/uPNJDweBNQYTHnUJSvefSgVKnYxZVjs2qzgGS TY9AqqwpqQsmYPVDDuqYAPfaf1DzN/vQPZMdkYRy3k4S0gZc9KIVM90ACPfCmJ3V0C5R FAij7nta3Wj5V35hGe8+jG9ysmNUs1PaVvs6gL0I48NB7o3NMjeOB2neJSIvjaCGQSdJ d98Qri6eBaAqfiK9uDKqgmdRfYnmW8ZiWh2diuuXFpvImxa+BQ6hjhje20Qg/ya82LgF ilgA== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDPzUWk9gH3iYzU0205vomnMZpParelTIInfyxowLW8VFC9mIZB VaQPH+UosZTyiCAO X-Received: by 10.28.17.143 with SMTP id 137mr7070079wmr.52.1496271171712; Wed, 31 May 2017 15:52:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowblower (cpc4-broo7-2-0-cust35.14-2.cable.virginm.net. [82.8.215.36]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g137sm22955095wme.27.2017.05.31.15.52.51 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 31 May 2017 15:52:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 23:52:47 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Forced/automatic USE flag constraints (codename: ENFORCED_USE) Message-ID: <20170531235247.2f68de95@snowblower> In-Reply-To: <1496257344.25758.1.camel@gentoo.org> References: <1496071993.31087.1.camel@gentoo.org> <20170529200037.2559f80a@gentoo.org> <1496093035.12795.3.camel@gentoo.org> <20170530094245.40e1cf64@gentoo.org> <20170530092245.681d4aeb@snowblower> <20170530104654.31b89e10@gentoo.org> <20170530095607.1adbc0b8@snowblower> <20170530112518.65b4f9e9@gentoo.org> <22829.24276.295.969060@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <1496154812.1238.5.camel@gentoo.org> <20170530173340.0b575526@gentoo.org> <1496167898.1335.1.camel@gentoo.org> <20170530204614.61e8e42c@gentoo.org> <1496213717.1164.1.camel@gentoo.org> <20170531093257.23b66f88@gentoo.org> <1496217792.1164.5.camel@gentoo.org> <20170531103819.417c2420@gentoo.org> <1496235892.25038.1.camel@gentoo.org> <20170531193922.477245bb@gentoo.org> <1496257344.25758.1.camel@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 1e39050b-9d31-4245-a36b-39febad3041b X-Archives-Hash: 11e7780c1115fd3e41b0c04200b53753 On Wed, 31 May 2017 21:02:24 +0200 Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > No, it can't. That's the whole point. The algorithm must be defined so > that it is always predictable independently of order So what's this mysterious algorithm then? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh