From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8683139694 for ; Thu, 4 May 2017 15:26:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F3F0B21C060; Thu, 4 May 2017 15:26:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FBD9E0CCB for ; Thu, 4 May 2017 15:26:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wim (jer.xs4all.nl [212.238.182.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jer) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F34B34164B for ; Thu, 4 May 2017 15:26:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 17:26:02 +0200 From: Jeroen Roovers To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla package list editing Message-ID: <20170504172602.78f9a85e@wim> In-Reply-To: <84f7fb6d-7a42-00e7-6043-f05f895ee9e8@gentoo.org> References: <1493548186.6038.2.camel@gentoo.org> <11422999.nSgCkNWNEm@pinacolada> <487e8818-1ee3-7bdc-65ac-01d55ae881d6@gentoo.org> <84f7fb6d-7a42-00e7-6043-f05f895ee9e8@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Foundation X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: f9d4a7bf-ab16-4371-a3e7-23a10c9fa8bb X-Archives-Hash: f0831f87663cca83c5a0c93838e94b7b On Tue, 2 May 2017 13:05:38 +0200 Ch=C3=AD-Thanh Christopher Nguy=E1=BB=85n wrote: > One recent example of non-maintainer activity in the package list > field is bug 613104, where he just removed the entire package list > (and then marked the bug WONTFIX). I've been in desktop-misc@ since at least October 2011. Additionally, I explained to Harri Nieminen (Moiman) what was wrong with that bug report, so I didn't "just" close the bug - I explained what was happening to the packages that he does _not_ officially maintain. Good luck with the cabal, jer