From: Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] crossdev: installing _host_ build dependencies not automatic?
Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 10:21:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170504102113.789c9c78@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170503224718.4fb7f666@symphony.aura-online.co.uk>
On Wed, 3 May 2017 22:47:18 +0100
James Le Cuirot <chewi@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 3 May 2017 17:56:43 +0200
> Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 3 May 2017 12:05:48 +0200
> > "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." <phajdan.jr@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I encountered <https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=617276>
> > > while working on some cross-compiling project.
> > >
> > > Admittedly, it may not be that easy to handle host package
> > > dependencies fully automatically.
> > >
> > > I'm wondering - is it documented what portage guarantees, and
> > > what I'm expected to just manually handle to provide host build
> > > dependencies?
> > >
> > > Any other advice about properly using crossdev would also be
> > > appreciated. I'd be happy to test and help improve things.
> >
> >
> > From man emerge:
> >
> >
> > --root-deps[=rdeps]
> > If no argument is given then build-time dependencies
> > of packages for ROOT are installed to ROOT instead of /. If the
> > rdeps argument is given then discard all build-time
> > dependencies of packages for ROOT. This option is only meaningful
> > when used together with ROOT and it should not be enabled under
> > normal circumstances!
> >
> > Does not affect EAPIs that support HDEPEND.
> > Experimental EAPI 5-hdepend provides HDEPEND as a new means to
> > adjust installation into "/" and ROOT. If ebuilds using EAPIs
> > which do not support HDEPEND are built in the same
> > emerge run as those using EAPIs which do support
> > HDEPEND, this option affects only the former.
> >
> >
> > crossdev wrappers set --root-deps=rdeps (read cross-emerge, this
> > can be overriden), but be careful: If you only care about getting
> > all the deps and maybe more then removing --root-deps might help
> > you. However, when cross compiling you will likely run into broken
> > deps since / and ROOT will not use the same keyword visibility.
>
> I was going to point to crossdev's use of --root-deps=rdeps too. I did
> wonder why on earth this was even added. I overrode it for quite a
> while and didn't have any issue. History showed that it was added by
> solar without much of an explanation. He's no longer around to ask. It
> wasn't until I tried to build a brand new ppc64le system recently that
> I finally found a reason for it, though I'm not sure it was the
> original reason. The multilib ABI USE flags start conflicting horribly
> in cross situations and this option seems to be the only way around it
> at present.
there's that and e.g. you might want to enable USE=mmal for cross
compiling to a raspberry pi; raspberrypi-userland will be in DEPEND but
you wont be able to merge it into /
> I doubt keyword visibility is an issue. Portage uses a different
> configuration between / and ROOT when cross-compiling. I don't think
> it tries to force the same package versions beyond what is specified
> in the ebuild. For pure build-time dependencies, the package will
> only be installed to / anyway (i.e. you don't need cmake in ROOT) so
> there is nothing to enforce here.
The issue is that we can't distinguish between target build time
dependencies (libraries, headers, etc.) and host build time
dependencies (cmake, autotools, etc.). While --root-deps=rdeps avoids
most of the problems at the cost of missing host deps, it still fails
horribly for target build time only deps (e.g. pure headers libraries).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-04 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-03 10:05 [gentoo-dev] crossdev: installing _host_ build dependencies not automatic? Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
2017-05-03 15:56 ` Alexis Ballier
2017-05-03 21:47 ` James Le Cuirot
2017-05-04 8:21 ` Alexis Ballier [this message]
2017-05-13 19:41 ` Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170504102113.789c9c78@gentoo.org \
--to=aballier@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox