From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71C6B139694 for ; Wed, 3 May 2017 17:10:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B39FE0CCA; Wed, 3 May 2017 17:10:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C51B8E0CB6 for ; Wed, 3 May 2017 17:10:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pc1 (vpn11.hotsplots.net [80.237.194.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hanno) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1CA6D341130 for ; Wed, 3 May 2017 17:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 19:10:42 +0200 From: Hanno =?UTF-8?B?QsO2Y2s=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry Message-ID: <20170503191042.1fda0063@pc1> In-Reply-To: <20170503164311.GA20929@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> References: <20170503164311.GA20929@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/2qGBwsOPz5D_Nj5yP5cu_R+"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 99716458-495a-44ef-ad82-883fafba1b32 X-Archives-Hash: b19325d8e3eb7d671a34814147956d21 --Sig_/2qGBwsOPz5D_Nj5yP5cu_R+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 3 May 2017 11:43:11 -0500 William Hubbs wrote: > I see that gcc-6.3 doesn't have keywords, so I'm > wondering when it will get them? Does anyone have any idea? I'm not > talking about stable keywords, just ~. ;-) Given that gcc 7.1 was just released and gcc 6 isn't even keyworded yet I'm wondering if it'd be an idea to right away strive for gcc 7 and skip keywording+stabilizing gcc 6.x in gentoo. --=20 Hanno B=C3=B6ck https://hboeck.de/ mail/jabber: hanno@hboeck.de GPG: FE73757FA60E4E21B937579FA5880072BBB51E42 --Sig_/2qGBwsOPz5D_Nj5yP5cu_R+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE/nN1f6YOTiG5N1efpYgAcru1HkIFAlkKDxIACgkQpYgAcru1 HkLlOA/+I/JJ20s+rDb5HDsCBSWBBoyWeT0jKNaPDjrafnzpnZaugdlnrlwchqfL CYxDrsfe0gLaD+3Ru6rapel9P2I/5KON2wLHuQU4cGVoUl0D4VyPTd4VjvmGqlRL 3/GRbjhfHrGuFLp6sVf+gRT4C0TmHkjt6UQLvpXgIi5bqZKZLv7DRopAaaCZ33TS MejjdyHWHto1zIBeJd/5zwMu67hCQGMmuFS+NHsVSjWS348xIBfkXelnj5Na4eZz z2g7LaUZvLOzw4SZ3fWmInl45eS85sk3jXCTu1FuQtC4j2m1jY7WnCJ5duog9IQ+ oAjYJmJF+YQaFwYzFm51Z64bETQwhzZE/6C6cwYNTTDImBokjbYRhsLP+JRcYejn N2GLyngLl4qUcQwNLMH1Xh7zP4A+gF/9LU5wln79izo/SaZAdw8TwlZss+cHs1dM X8JbB7kHmSQJjQLCGUJlUctIe5tDkmQaszlhxLtoMfGjKvxvaeYgTvU49Z4pN+1a lA5PJ/wm+ICTlEfs/EAtBubfWrbhq14PV8VeHgdjq6EjFzKcC4i8BS6TXYXgqi/v rDxjUq4FOPHq0P5s8qZEZSSiVNIUr1iL6fvhYFzvMupaavrCBVCcx215JffSytmw G8RQrLkIBf0Nr7oJ8lXuXSf6dFOd5vZ3JoyydhXMCLn59grmWes= =eVhN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/2qGBwsOPz5D_Nj5yP5cu_R+--