From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46E57139694 for ; Wed, 3 May 2017 18:42:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB419E0CE1; Wed, 3 May 2017 18:42:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-it0-x244.google.com (mail-it0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9047AE0CBC for ; Wed, 3 May 2017 18:42:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-x244.google.com with SMTP id x188so7402422itb.3 for ; Wed, 03 May 2017 11:42:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=/mjvU8jp0ZSuI6kRjIYKYfhHZwLuu+nmxmTXdaUYzOc=; b=ftFu0DiHr4kWF4pCERz0EY+ci7z2vvIwsApCDPJ9f2AZqUImyE05Hdb+vizvhlJSBC thAlb5/IsnCJmxmXgmvKHyveURSHfRzixMJV105GTpDUt1XYJtZcHvACQkGpI3+04L7U b+2qd3Wt0i2uSfT+snZ1CQUq2UnnZBzzkurukA5Op4xb6iOHJ5P8UnOBEpNDr0qzvr1h K2qqJuXDm9pUUkhmkhB+uLvn8VInp1EshfHuT+QTVwRyGWaVGZN3jPy3L11j6uZQd1bN EpTBAM/jOxzxqpx2UgvK7AxfltYuqbe7YvYZRmsBRlk6/7AwqQ3eIa0WolOKg8lOYMXS FF2A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=/mjvU8jp0ZSuI6kRjIYKYfhHZwLuu+nmxmTXdaUYzOc=; b=mkLLTO9X03zLTqahjPc8fz31MJfhSXzevN0nJFPcksE4xnrf+6XUBXPrlAo3rsfLhj CZzR7Zz4K05Z4mtN1ikXvH4uUVXsQekQSjBr4GAvkrJD2069677naECxH5U1dk59I4mK D1Qpyo+bFOuoWE5lOqDAGnG49IE6CAkIceGyC7Rn08QeA0f1KjJG2qDp4e5ppnNJJEyg IpG7b8ohevwkQwczqwltDKHBkv7nBzNRffEFjArkoyt0sTeE3nHrs9UcTEYVPWb+uODW D3AVSO+vvdSNyh83AMjB/DVcbRoONYtx0rgLZyAhegxC6h20HPv/nt/4hIff4Cu+MmpZ Ls2w== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/41moUKhaPTtuFtskWXIq9gP4qgLkZoX5CeHIz0NpJaa2bIRwL0 D3n6OUZpHVLCYQ== X-Received: by 10.202.102.144 with SMTP id m16mr5759718oik.76.1493836936754; Wed, 03 May 2017 11:42:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from whubbs1.gaikai.biz ([100.42.103.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r138sm5026930oie.36.2017.05.03.11.42.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 May 2017 11:42:16 -0700 (PDT) Sender: William Hubbs Received: (nullmailer pid 21457 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 03 May 2017 18:42:15 -0000 Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 13:42:15 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: toolchain@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gcc-6.x status inquiry Message-ID: <20170503184215.GA21428@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, toolchain@gentoo.org References: <20170503164311.GA20929@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> <1187ac04-2b02-6c21-e7a0-d46cf846e2a3@gentoo.org> <71687537-4bd1-4489-9d80-246d8e2c1472@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <71687537-4bd1-4489-9d80-246d8e2c1472@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Archives-Salt: 78c15d33-4ade-4848-b42d-78b16390b282 X-Archives-Hash: 062a1489b0d542cf229500bf65c8a7ab --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 02:00:26PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 03/05/17 01:58 PM, Luca Barbato wrote: > > On 5/3/17 6:43 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > >> Hey all, > >> > >> I am asking about this because I have been asked to look into > >> packaging software that has a specific requirement for >=3Dgcc-6 in or= der > >> to build [1]. > >=20 > > As I said few times, we should dump gcc-5 sooner than later and any > > software that does not build with gcc-6 should be p.masked and dropped > > from the tree if there isn't a nice fix for it. >=20 > Just a heads-up, that p.mask list would happen to include firefox and=20 > thunderbird right now. =20 So if we don't p.mask those, is them breaking with gcc-6 still enough to keep gcc-6 out of ~? If not, I definitely +1 what lu_zero said, let's add ~keywords to gcc-6. William --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQTVeuxEZo4uUHOkQAluVBb0MMRlOAUCWQokgQAKCRBuVBb0MMRl ONtlAJ9PKIgdtDTWc8M5SM4e8v1f1vosqACbBDJT+ZK0Xj5imuzQeP49rtDaCfI= =mg8B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx--