* [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry
@ 2017-05-03 16:43 William Hubbs
2017-05-03 17:10 ` Hanno Böck
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: William Hubbs @ 2017-05-03 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev; +Cc: toolchain
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 407 bytes --]
Hey all,
I am asking about this because I have been asked to look into
packaging software that has a specific requirement for >=gcc-6 in order
to build [1].
I see that gcc-6.3 doesn't have keywords, so I'm
wondering when it will get them? Does anyone have any idea? I'm not
talking about stable keywords, just ~. ;-)
Thanks much,
William
[1] https://www.cockroachlabs.com/docs/install-cockroachdb.html
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry
2017-05-03 16:43 [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry William Hubbs
@ 2017-05-03 17:10 ` Hanno Böck
2017-05-03 17:58 ` [gentoo-dev] " Luca Barbato
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Hanno Böck @ 2017-05-03 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 561 bytes --]
On Wed, 3 May 2017 11:43:11 -0500
William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org> wrote:
> I see that gcc-6.3 doesn't have keywords, so I'm
> wondering when it will get them? Does anyone have any idea? I'm not
> talking about stable keywords, just ~. ;-)
Given that gcc 7.1 was just released and gcc 6 isn't even keyworded yet
I'm wondering if it'd be an idea to right away strive for gcc 7 and
skip keywording+stabilizing gcc 6.x in gentoo.
--
Hanno Böck
https://hboeck.de/
mail/jabber: hanno@hboeck.de
GPG: FE73757FA60E4E21B937579FA5880072BBB51E42
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: gcc-6.x status inquiry
2017-05-03 16:43 [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry William Hubbs
2017-05-03 17:10 ` Hanno Böck
@ 2017-05-03 17:58 ` Luca Barbato
2017-05-03 18:00 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2017-05-03 18:57 ` [gentoo-dev] " Andreas K. Huettel
2017-05-04 21:20 ` [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry William Hubbs
3 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Luca Barbato @ 2017-05-03 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev, toolchain
On 5/3/17 6:43 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I am asking about this because I have been asked to look into
> packaging software that has a specific requirement for >=gcc-6 in order
> to build [1].
>
> I see that gcc-6.3 doesn't have keywords, so I'm
> wondering when it will get them? Does anyone have any idea? I'm not
> talking about stable keywords, just ~. ;-)
>
> Thanks much,
>
> William
>
> [1] https://www.cockroachlabs.com/docs/install-cockroachdb.html
>
As I said few times, we should dump gcc-5 sooner than later and any
software that does not build with gcc-6 should be p.masked and dropped
from the tree if there isn't a nice fix for it.
So, I'm not seeing anything wrong in ~ gcc-6.
lu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gcc-6.x status inquiry
2017-05-03 17:58 ` [gentoo-dev] " Luca Barbato
@ 2017-05-03 18:00 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2017-05-03 18:42 ` William Hubbs
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Ian Stakenvicius @ 2017-05-03 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On 03/05/17 01:58 PM, Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 5/3/17 6:43 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I am asking about this because I have been asked to look into
>> packaging software that has a specific requirement for >=gcc-6 in order
>> to build [1].
>
> As I said few times, we should dump gcc-5 sooner than later and any
> software that does not build with gcc-6 should be p.masked and dropped
> from the tree if there isn't a nice fix for it.
Just a heads-up, that p.mask list would happen to include firefox and
thunderbird right now.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gcc-6.x status inquiry
2017-05-03 18:00 ` Ian Stakenvicius
@ 2017-05-03 18:42 ` William Hubbs
2017-05-03 19:06 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2017-05-03 18:44 ` Erik Närström
2017-05-04 7:28 ` grozin
2 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: William Hubbs @ 2017-05-03 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev; +Cc: toolchain
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 846 bytes --]
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 02:00:26PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 03/05/17 01:58 PM, Luca Barbato wrote:
> > On 5/3/17 6:43 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> >> Hey all,
> >>
> >> I am asking about this because I have been asked to look into
> >> packaging software that has a specific requirement for >=gcc-6 in order
> >> to build [1].
> >
> > As I said few times, we should dump gcc-5 sooner than later and any
> > software that does not build with gcc-6 should be p.masked and dropped
> > from the tree if there isn't a nice fix for it.
>
> Just a heads-up, that p.mask list would happen to include firefox and
> thunderbird right now.
So if we don't p.mask those, is them breaking with gcc-6 still enough
to keep gcc-6 out of ~? If not, I definitely +1 what lu_zero said,
let's add ~keywords to gcc-6.
William
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gcc-6.x status inquiry
2017-05-03 18:00 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2017-05-03 18:42 ` William Hubbs
@ 2017-05-03 18:44 ` Erik Närström
2017-05-04 7:28 ` grozin
2 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Erik Närström @ 2017-05-03 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 698 bytes --]
? Firefox compiles for me, i am unstable amd64.
/ekg
On 3 May 2017 20:02, "Ian Stakenvicius" <axs@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 03/05/17 01:58 PM, Luca Barbato wrote:
>
>> On 5/3/17 6:43 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>>
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>> I am asking about this because I have been asked to look into
>>> packaging software that has a specific requirement for >=gcc-6 in order
>>> to build [1].
>>>
>>
>> As I said few times, we should dump gcc-5 sooner than later and any
>> software that does not build with gcc-6 should be p.masked and dropped
>> from the tree if there isn't a nice fix for it.
>>
>
> Just a heads-up, that p.mask list would happen to include firefox and
> thunderbird right now.
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1282 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry
2017-05-03 16:43 [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry William Hubbs
2017-05-03 17:10 ` Hanno Böck
2017-05-03 17:58 ` [gentoo-dev] " Luca Barbato
@ 2017-05-03 18:57 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2017-05-03 19:25 ` Matthias Maier
2017-05-04 21:20 ` [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry William Hubbs
3 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Andreas K. Huettel @ 2017-05-03 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev, toolchain
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 703 bytes --]
>
> I see that gcc-6.3 doesn't have keywords, so I'm
> wondering when it will get them? Does anyone have any idea? I'm not
> talking about stable keywords, just ~. ;-)
>
Just as a datapoint, my main dev system is ~80% stable and has been updating
with gcc-6 since beginning of february; no problems. [*] [**]
Without looking at the blockers I'd be fine with ~arch gcc-6.3 asap (so we can
eventually get gcc-7 in masked).
[*] Well I had to fix a sci-* package I'm mantaining myself, but I'm likely the
only user of it, so...
[**] That include "no problems when building firefox".
--
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfridge@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice)
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 981 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gcc-6.x status inquiry
2017-05-03 18:42 ` William Hubbs
@ 2017-05-03 19:06 ` Ian Stakenvicius
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Ian Stakenvicius @ 2017-05-03 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On 03/05/17 02:42 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 02:00:26PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>> On 03/05/17 01:58 PM, Luca Barbato wrote:
>>> On 5/3/17 6:43 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>>>> Hey all,
>>>>
>>>> I am asking about this because I have been asked to look into
>>>> packaging software that has a specific requirement for >=gcc-6 in order
>>>> to build [1].
>>>
>>> As I said few times, we should dump gcc-5 sooner than later and any
>>> software that does not build with gcc-6 should be p.masked and dropped
>>> from the tree if there isn't a nice fix for it.
>>
>> Just a heads-up, that p.mask list would happen to include firefox and
>> thunderbird right now.
>
> So if we don't p.mask those, is them breaking with gcc-6 still enough
> to keep gcc-6 out of ~? If not, I definitely +1 what lu_zero said,
> let's add ~keywords to gcc-6.
>
> William
>
No, i'm good with keywording gcc-6 still. I'm just not Ok with
firefox and tbird and others being p.masked for removal simply because
they don't build.
Also its worth noting that the gcc-6.3 build failure is apparently not
absolute, there are people that have built mozilla stuff fine with 6.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry
2017-05-03 18:57 ` [gentoo-dev] " Andreas K. Huettel
@ 2017-05-03 19:25 ` Matthias Maier
2017-05-04 15:22 ` Thomas Deutschmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Maier @ 2017-05-03 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 307 bytes --]
> Just as a datapoint, my main dev system is ~80% stable and has been updating
> with gcc-6 since beginning of february; no problems. [*] [**]
Same here. The gcc-6 incompatibilities were resolved quite a while
ago. Let's keyword gcc-6 and try to get gcc-7 into the tree on time.
Best,
Matthias
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 850 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gcc-6.x status inquiry
2017-05-03 18:00 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2017-05-03 18:42 ` William Hubbs
2017-05-03 18:44 ` Erik Närström
@ 2017-05-04 7:28 ` grozin
2017-05-04 7:48 ` Erik Närström
2 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: grozin @ 2017-05-04 7:28 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Wed, 3 May 2017, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 03/05/17 01:58 PM, Luca Barbato wrote:
>> As I said few times, we should dump gcc-5 sooner than later and any
>> software that does not build with gcc-6 should be p.masked and dropped
>> from the tree if there isn't a nice fix for it.
> Just a heads-up, that p.mask list would happen to include firefox and
> thunderbird right now.
And pdftk. It needs gcj, and has no usable alternatives.
What should I keep in my system to continue to use (and maybe recompile)
pdftk?
Andrey
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gcc-6.x status inquiry
2017-05-04 7:28 ` grozin
@ 2017-05-04 7:48 ` Erik Närström
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Erik Närström @ 2017-05-04 7:48 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 675 bytes --]
Portage pulls in gcc-5.4 when i run 'emerge -p pdftk'.
/ekg
On 4 May 2017 09:29, <grozin@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 3 May 2017, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>
>> On 03/05/17 01:58 PM, Luca Barbato wrote:
>>
>>> As I said few times, we should dump gcc-5 sooner than later and any
>>> software that does not build with gcc-6 should be p.masked and dropped
>>> from the tree if there isn't a nice fix for it.
>>>
>> Just a heads-up, that p.mask list would happen to include firefox and
>> thunderbird right now.
>>
> And pdftk. It needs gcj, and has no usable alternatives.
>
> What should I keep in my system to continue to use (and maybe recompile)
> pdftk?
>
> Andrey
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1258 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry
2017-05-03 19:25 ` Matthias Maier
@ 2017-05-04 15:22 ` Thomas Deutschmann
2017-05-04 21:32 ` Getting gcc-6 keyworded (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry) Andreas K. Huettel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Deutschmann @ 2017-05-04 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 148 bytes --]
On 2017-05-03 21:25, Matthias Maier wrote:
> Let's keyword gcc-6 and try to get gcc-7 into the tree on time.
+1
--
Regards,
Thomas
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 951 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry
2017-05-03 16:43 [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry William Hubbs
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2017-05-03 18:57 ` [gentoo-dev] " Andreas K. Huettel
@ 2017-05-04 21:20 ` William Hubbs
2017-05-04 21:30 ` Matthias Maier
3 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: William Hubbs @ 2017-05-04 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 568 bytes --]
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 11:43:11AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I am asking about this because I have been asked to look into
> packaging software that has a specific requirement for >=gcc-6 in order
> to build [1].
>
> I see that gcc-6.3 doesn't have keywords, so I'm
> wondering when it will get them? Does anyone have any idea? I'm not
> talking about stable keywords, just ~. ;-)
After the discussion on this thread (no one seemed to object), I went
ahead just now and added ~ keywords to sys-devel/gcc-6.3.0.
Thanks,
William
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry
2017-05-04 21:20 ` [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry William Hubbs
@ 2017-05-04 21:30 ` Matthias Maier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Maier @ 2017-05-04 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 225 bytes --]
> After the discussion on this thread (no one seemed to object), I went
> ahead just now and added ~ keywords to sys-devel/gcc-6.3.0.
Thanks a lot!
Did you update any keywording bug (if one is open at all)?
Best,
Matthias
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 850 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Getting gcc-6 keyworded (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry)
2017-05-04 15:22 ` Thomas Deutschmann
@ 2017-05-04 21:32 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2017-05-04 21:33 ` Andreas K. Huettel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Andreas K. Huettel @ 2017-05-04 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 719 bytes --]
OK since
a) nobody from toolchain responds here,
b) a lot of people are in favour of doing this, but
c) noone wants to do it himself, and
d) I dont have the time to do all the research I deem necessary to do it
myself,
let's harness the power of the developer community.
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Toolchain/GCC-6_keywording
Go here^, look at one blocker bug, decide why it shouldn't block keywording
gcc-6, and comment in the list, ending your comment with ~~~~. In the end
hopefully all the entries should look like
* bug 12345: Occurs only with -funroll-loops. User:Dilfridge
--
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfridge@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice)
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 981 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Getting gcc-6 keyworded (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry)
2017-05-04 21:32 ` Getting gcc-6 keyworded (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry) Andreas K. Huettel
@ 2017-05-04 21:33 ` Andreas K. Huettel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Andreas K. Huettel @ 2017-05-04 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 371 bytes --]
Am Donnerstag, 4. Mai 2017, 23:32:19 CEST schrieb Andreas K. Huettel:
> OK since
>
> a) nobody from toolchain responds here,
> b) a lot of people are in favour of doing this, but
> c) noone wants to do it himself, and
Forget this. William already did it. YAY!!!
--
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfridge@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice)
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 981 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-05-04 21:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-05-03 16:43 [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry William Hubbs
2017-05-03 17:10 ` Hanno Böck
2017-05-03 17:58 ` [gentoo-dev] " Luca Barbato
2017-05-03 18:00 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2017-05-03 18:42 ` William Hubbs
2017-05-03 19:06 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2017-05-03 18:44 ` Erik Närström
2017-05-04 7:28 ` grozin
2017-05-04 7:48 ` Erik Närström
2017-05-03 18:57 ` [gentoo-dev] " Andreas K. Huettel
2017-05-03 19:25 ` Matthias Maier
2017-05-04 15:22 ` Thomas Deutschmann
2017-05-04 21:32 ` Getting gcc-6 keyworded (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry) Andreas K. Huettel
2017-05-04 21:33 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2017-05-04 21:20 ` [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry William Hubbs
2017-05-04 21:30 ` Matthias Maier
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox