From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42F9E139694 for ; Mon, 1 May 2017 13:39:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7DEC621C07C; Mon, 1 May 2017 13:39:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 298F9E0769 for ; Mon, 1 May 2017 13:39:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from katipo2.lan (unknown [203.86.205.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kentnl) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF8B63416AE for ; Mon, 1 May 2017 13:39:02 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 01:38:39 +1200 From: Kent Fredric To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-portage/eclass-manpages: Add support for @DEFAULT-VALUE Message-ID: <20170502013839.4071be1f@katipo2.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <20170430213741.21740-1-kentnl@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/1uh.fyQ6iX5rmTrpm/ov__e"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 68aac18d-cf7c-4379-be1f-148b87f2d74c X-Archives-Hash: 606132810e413f8c8d90f12221320532 --Sig_/1uh.fyQ6iX5rmTrpm/ov__e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 01 May 2017 12:14:01 +0200 Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > Any reason you can't just eat_line? Would require me to reflow the entire function, eat_line calls getline for = you. Here, that would mean it would call "getline", and then the loop would cont= inue, and then it would call getline a second time, losing a line of input. --Sig_/1uh.fyQ6iX5rmTrpm/ov__e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEPZazbI/qrFT1o9rn6FQySxNmqCAFAlkHOnAACgkQ6FQySxNm qCDIyg//VcxX5xVXBFAYzOOOS3pfVyR4V+4XcZneMCCZ/RVXTcrUq3FGNNcZqTeg cLHnyp0Ey7TatUhZ+Jdo2FmQSHQR+CBVu4EngR0YGJRmuMphWBvmKmFZjbOAyzuB ZqmzdRmcPYIRDw5L25hwncgWIHT3o45n6dD+55GHjHt1mwQXsvHygiNLSgJqSruN V8kJn+3xUzv0M0ZBPkg+jUhAkbb7qj4zJdR4J6c7DJMf2Udw2dx0kiFrxDuKD0Z8 BerbzOG9oGx8yG+fpaSUIxVOw3MmCAdkYiy06+ji4qnKKKFlYWeytlCvvmwixIxE rbQLULdGxtS+g/0H/elyLIXjGSgyLPpPxMjH2jpt/55bjBh/vRVKS1Xsa4EmZxvn lwczJ7tahrDDAoQCVqxPjD8RGC8o1NYmyxLZNN0zdubDjr0tXZzQ9JEccdMMuMi+ M8B3G4+qXRG9pzV2xIBWZ6VGnUU89bfuMBcG+QIYsW5aOn8WB07qGYDZW3JBjr3r OxiKzZ5i40+pPwtMpXRe5T9ZnPpv/GU5gKwmO72w2OkgkC3Xsrtnxe63TKZQWXEX bAFhJKpA2XsdNt6VpRk+XRh7ZMgOfc3sMzNxglrqmLJW0CUJt1GiL8Q+5k6WjpCB G8ur6CkY96lJ2wD25zQ+q0dj7KJMYQFRD6i3h4+Y9oVJ0K2fSks= =oQxH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/1uh.fyQ6iX5rmTrpm/ov__e--