public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kent Fredric <kentnl@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Providing consistent means to enable tests requiring Internet access
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 02:00:20 +1200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170429020020.228276b1@katipo2.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1493386635.3838.0.camel@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1226 bytes --]

On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 15:37:15 +0200
Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:

> Congratulations, you've just completely discouraged me from pursuing
> this any further. I don't have the time or the resources to solve all
> the problems in the world, especially if I don't give a damn about
> them.

Its not that I don't want a solution here, but this has been something
that has long bothered me, sufficient I want to eventually see this
turn into a future-EAPI proposal.

I think if I was to say there is something we can do today for this,
I'd use a non-use variable to regulate it, expressly so it *cant* be
used in SRC_URI or DEPEND

perl-module.eclass has such a feature already, if an end user specifies
DIST_TEST_OVERRIDE="do parallel network", certain tests stop being
disabled ( though doing this globally will turn on a lot more tests
that are currently disabled for non-network related reasons, and force
parallelism where its not warranted, so said feature is still a poor
model to adopt verbatim in a global way )

But trying to decide on a shared ENV var that has default mechanics and
default implications and is enforced by portage quickly gets into
GLEP/EAPI territory anyway.




[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2017-04-28 14:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-27 14:14 [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Providing consistent means to enable tests requiring Internet access Michał Górny
2017-04-27 21:42 ` Alexis Ballier
2017-04-27 21:57   ` Mike Gilbert
2017-04-28  9:22     ` Alexis Ballier
2017-04-28  5:07   ` Michał Górny
2017-04-28  9:19     ` Alexis Ballier
2017-04-28 13:25 ` Kent Fredric
2017-04-28 13:37   ` Michał Górny
2017-04-28 14:00     ` Kent Fredric [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170429020020.228276b1@katipo2.lan \
    --to=kentnl@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox