From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70F80139694 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:38:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A54621C0A9; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:38:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2E5C21C039 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:38:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e34:eeaa:6bd0:4ecc:6aff:fe03:1cfc]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: aballier) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3475033BEBE for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:38:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 10:38:01 +0100 From: Alexis Ballier To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Master plan for fixing elibtoolize Message-ID: <20170322103801.116a5884@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20170318192936.GI25144@stuge.se> References: <1489770852.1490.6.camel@gentoo.org> <20170317233836.13b5de95@symphony.aura-online.co.uk> <1489820011.1289.1.camel@gentoo.org> <20170318111847.34b21502@gentoo.org> <1489832518.1289.9.camel@gentoo.org> <20170318113105.1d912494@gentoo.org> <20170318192936.GI25144@stuge.se> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a14d5d79-9272-4258-8cb2-0a2845be7502 X-Archives-Hash: 88c497d7d49bcd11180197a386f7aaf3 On Sat, 18 Mar 2017 19:29:36 +0000 Peter Stuge wrote: > Alexis Ballier wrote: > > > If elibtoolize results in different binaries being produced, then > > > it's done wrong in the first place. AFAIU the primary goal of > > > elibtoolize logic is to fix issues on recent systems with > > > outdated build systems. Which is certainly not something that > > > needs to be done for every user out there. > > > > You probably didn't have a look at what the patches fix. Having a > > quick look at patches there, > > Where are those patches you mention? Those in ELT-patches... > > I could fine one fixing relink to old libs (from / instead of $D), > > I have an open bug for this for a package, both in Gentoo and > upstream. It seems to be a problem with libtool itself, is that > about right? With recent libtools it is most likely to be the package's fault, like wrong/poor usage of autotools. > > another one fixing parallel install. The former produces broken > > binaries, the latter none at all. > > > > I seriously doubt this shouldn't be fixed for every user. > > What "this" do you refer to? Sorry for the confusion, I want to > understand. the bugs