From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E08E9139694 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 12:19:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 098B821C124; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 12:19:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A950A21C043 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 12:19:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dra13-4-78-234-166-189.fbx.proxad.net [78.234.166.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: aballier) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 496CB341398; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 12:19:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 13:19:11 +0100 From: Alexis Ballier To: Ulrich Mueller Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, qa@gentoo.org, base-system@gentoo.org, =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] sys-devel/autoconf: Convert from eblits into an eclass, #586424 Message-ID: <20170316131911.25e49c7d@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <22730.25568.382258.703491@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <20170316093806.31977-1-mgorny@gentoo.org> <22730.25568.382258.703491@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 094d97a6-f9fc-41e9-ade5-63bdb582d9ee X-Archives-Hash: de3fd7f19f00e1a1d9a027d98525763d On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:07:33 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: =20 >=20 > > 100 insertions(+), 198 deletions(-) =20 >=20 > This alone is rather convincing. Indeed, but that eclass fails to follow devmanual eclass 101 [1]: An eclass is a collection of code which can be used by more than one ebuild. While this eclass might be a good temporary solution, I find it a rather convincing argument for per-package eclasses :) Alexis. [1] https://devmanual.gentoo.org/eclass-writing/index.html