From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92A0C139085 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 15:24:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE807E0CC0; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 15:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FDF4E0C87 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 15:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from symphony.aura-online.co.uk (154.189.187.81.in-addr.arpa [81.187.189.154]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: chewi) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 123A3341265 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 15:24:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 15:23:50 +0000 From: James Le Cuirot To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: toolchain.eclass prefix support Message-ID: <20170107152350.079bf1aa@symphony.aura-online.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <87r34esycm.fsf@gentoo.org> References: <87r34esycm.fsf@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/6y=VvCLj/RKqwuxgQO_aOgj"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 64c1cea3-f293-4c49-abe5-f7f86fc586df X-Archives-Hash: f06a3e8613e458ea0d15f62b4ee75eee --Sig_/6y=VvCLj/RKqwuxgQO_aOgj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 08 Jan 2017 00:07:05 +0900 Benda Xu wrote: > * Define ED and EROOT for EAPI 0, 1 and 2. Why? All the ebuilds using this eclass that I can find are at least EAPI 4. --=20 James Le Cuirot (chewi) Gentoo Linux Developer --Sig_/6y=VvCLj/RKqwuxgQO_aOgj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJYcQgGXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ1MjhERTZCRDg2OTFBNDM5MUZEQTJFRDQy MUM2MzIxMjlDNkQ3REU0AAoJECHGMhKcbX3kY9MP/25k5asr0cQ2kQM2U+cEc+9o 1TRquoeHV6C/PpufgpSwSEo+rIwJD8oSDSFJ7B3tzLbmsWOi6f1xy4MZ0YNkplr+ +NCsctaXujIe8eD0EGcl8yo2406tUkxjWGt9kVy5w4Fi0GbvQoAbA6KPC6W9IEnx PSDtBmWNIU+FuGIFxBcHJThRMdGcCm8y4p0kQI4UG7yd/wHKDIlogFGeLVWU8fbV tKmge7Z80385Xy11gryS0cyeQw+0wfuGD5wUgZUeohKMc9A6MzyHhIGB6UJ6K4aO NEzr+EMGmryG+SjO5aco4zepCndJtwFdDOJbKkgl6K9pxVTqeFWQmCp16rysF2+B feyrfhyYIwpYvhQBwjYxOCphpyr/MgrFtOxUEtgnhKMCeCqynwloiAVrrRpunscG rg3VTOhJIHpFlsx4ZCcfiMvHJ+G91buldHhUYs/25Q6wNDQyKDXzCCJQ80Y7Alca mPI/9Lj9JjEN5b+OdjV/LZPoXk2BYW4ygHLNxuSsTi4Jb7mylv6xPqVoCDusj/yr JeeyeYsyT1ETdu01xHVJLCtE/1zIet37JtR/yUFSGMSgFUxZMJ1ukcKEOqx/q4qh PLTG9XO9xMROHJWm9gP5a4R2LIMv96Qk1Jxptsih63X2Kx1AlIgbJh1UtRqPjD9g sZtJB4VjI/YTIUT5VPsZ =NW1s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/6y=VvCLj/RKqwuxgQO_aOgj--